Question:
"If a quart of a poison will kill you don’t assume that you can swallow a pint and survive." And if a hundred aspirin will kill you, never take even one.
Response:
> "If a quart of a poison will kill you don’t assume that you can swallow a pint > and survive." > And if a hundred aspirin will kill you, never take even one.
Sorry, yet another low grade response. Here, let me help you out. The actual comment, had you been honest, was as follows: "Yep, and still being severely spanked at home, constantly. It works like this. If a quart of a poison will kill you don’t assume that you can swallow a pint and survive." It seems you equate asprin with with spanking, while I equate it with poison. So, do you think spanking has a positive effect on a child? Tell us how that works, will you? No, I think not. You can’t begin to mount any kind of real argument in favor of spanking as a successful tool for parenting, only that everyone does it. Well, everyone doesn’t. Sorry, Lil ‘o’ the Failure. You did it yet again. arh arh ahr arh arh. Bingo, bango, bongo. Stoneman.
Response:
" . . . yet another low grade response." For a low grade zealot’s mind.
Response:
> " . . . public became aware of child abuse and increaed their rates of reporting > it rather than increased child abuse itself." > Oh, this is a gem!
Actually it is, since that is very likely what happened. We see this all the time in flawed research. > Sweden banned corporal punishment in schools in 1928, half a century before the > nationwide no-spank law.
Now here’s where you really start to show your ‘intelligence’, arh arh arh. > So, at least a full generation had grown up under the > in-school corporal punishment ban and the younger generation, in turn, were > still turning kids over to straighten them out.
Yep, and still being severely spanked at home, constantly. It works like this. If a quart of a poison will kill you don’t assume that you can swallow a pint and survive. The children were still being hit by authority figures. > Even in a small country, that speaks volumes regarding the effectiveness of > education.
Yes it does. The failure to extend the no-spank alterantives made it abundantly clear that trying to make changes in only one venue was pointless since children should be learning more from their parents than the school system. The current successes in reducing spanking and increasing the public rejection of cp as a parenting method bear out that the large more comprehensive training, education, and public awareness campaign works. It’s happening here. Live with it. Your own failure points up that it wasn’t education but the lack of sufficient education (or the inability to learn by a shit vomiting hyena such as you) that was the problem, in your case. We’ll be sure to remember there are still those like you around. You FAILED and don’t forget it. You have zero credibility and you’ve shown it yet again with this stupid piece of garbage you tried and failed to foist off. arh arh arh. Bingo, bango, bongo. Stoneman
If you like this post and would like to receive updates from this blog, please subscribe our feed.