Pure Parents

Question:

: I think you’re the fucking pervert Dagwind!      "Dagwind" is an alias of a spanking fetishist who has been posting as a prospanker on alt.parenting.spanking since late 1999.  Ignore him. Chris

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Aint it strange how none of these spankers has the balls to stand up > and take on these arguments yet they all have the balls to wank over > kid’s pain and humiliation & thrill to the sexual perversion of > spanking children.  & aint it funny that all their lies about why they > do it are also a way of getting their pathetic satisfactions in sex, > sex that being so ugly & sexually inadequate and also so fucking >stupid > they can’t get nowise else.   & aint it hilarious how these liberal > cunt social worker hippie Clintonite fuckfaces just curl up & die when > you say all this OBVIOUS stuff out loud.  Makes you wonder what makes > them tick too… >Yes you are a disturbed moron. And why are you so hung up on sexual >issues that you feel the need to bring them into a parenting >discussion?

Its because he is a PROJECTILE DEVIANT. He will accuse you of the very thing he does, as to detour the attention off of himself. You will never get through to this type. He can not reason respectively. I wonder though, just how many children he has molested. He might just be one of our MOST WANTED, or if in the States, may even be on a JAIL computer, possibly doing time for Child Molestation. He wants to find others who think like he does. Maybe plotting to team up with a few others after his release. There’s a scary thought. Got questions?  Get answers over the phone at Keen.com. Up to 100 minutes free! http://www.keen.com

Response:

I think you’re the fucking pervert Dagwind! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Aint it strange how none of these spankers has the balls to stand up > and take on these arguments yet they all have the balls to wank over > kid’s pain and humiliation & thrill to the sexual perversion of > spanking children.  & aint it funny that all their lies about why they > do it are also a way of getting their pathetic satisfactions in sex, > sex that being so ugly & sexually inadequate and also so fucking > stupid > they can’t get nowise else.   & aint it hilarious how these liberal > cunt social worker hippie Clintonite fuckfaces just curl up & die when > you say all this OBVIOUS stuff out loud.  Makes you wonder what makes > them tick too…

Response:

> > Aint it strange how none of these spankers has the balls to stand up > and take on these arguments yet they all have the balls to wank over > kid’s pain and humiliation & thrill to the sexual perversion of > spanking children.  & aint it funny that all their lies about why they > do it are also a way of getting their pathetic satisfactions in sex, > sex that being so ugly & sexually inadequate and also so fucking > stupid > they can’t get nowise else.   & aint it hilarious how these liberal > cunt social worker hippie Clintonite fuckfaces just curl up & die when > you say all this OBVIOUS stuff out loud.  Makes you wonder what makes > them tick too…

I have yet to measure exactly how unintelligence of this statement really is. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Indeed Rubisky.  Indeed! > > > Wow. > > > >  I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and > controversy > > in > > > > various alt groups, as > > > >  well as the ritual unease and bad faith. > > > > However, when all is said and > > > >  done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my > assertion > > that > > > >  adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure > and > > > >  gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor > the > > > >  genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > > > >  called "spanking". > > > >  Anyone who demurs or resists this idea is somewhat suspect. > After > > > all, > > > >  this is how we will prove or disprove the assertion – one way > or > > the > > > >  other. > > > >  And all that blarney about whether spanking > > > >  is "effective", "salutary", "necessary", "unnecessary", etc > will > > pale > > > >  into insignificance faced with the reality of that indecent and > > > >  secretive PLEASURE…

You have your psychiactric studies mixed up. While spaking for any kind of sexual pleasure is a well known paraphilla it is however, unheard of in the argument of whether or not its good to spank a child. Some parents only do it cause that’s what was passed on to them. There is a big difference between that particular paraphillia and the act of spanking as a disciplinary measure. Get your facts straight. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > > > Before you buy. > > > Before you buy. > > Before you buy. > Before you buy. > Before you buy.

Response:

> Aint it strange how none of these spankers has the balls to stand up > and take on these arguments yet they all have the balls to wank over > kid’s pain and humiliation & thrill to the sexual perversion of > spanking children.  & aint it funny that all their lies about why they > do it are also a way of getting their pathetic satisfactions in sex, > sex that being so ugly & sexually inadequate and also so fucking stupid > they can’t get nowise else.   & aint it hilarious how these liberal > cunt social worker hippie Clintonite fuckfaces just curl up & die when > you say all this OBVIOUS stuff out loud.  Makes you wonder what makes > them tick too…

You’re positively weird. First you decry spanking and then you talk like a fucking talk-radio reactionary asshole and trash the very people who might actually support your view to some small degree!! You’re simply confused, and that’s about all. Steve

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Aint it strange how none of these spankers has the balls to stand up > and take on these arguments yet they all have the balls to wank over > kid’s pain and humiliation & thrill to the sexual perversion of > spanking children.  & aint it funny that all their lies about why they > do it are also a way of getting their pathetic satisfactions in sex, > sex that being so ugly & sexually inadequate and also so fucking stupid > they can’t get nowise else.   & aint it hilarious how these liberal > cunt social worker hippie Clintonite fuckfaces just curl up & die when > you say all this OBVIOUS stuff out loud.  Makes you wonder what makes > them tick too… > Indeed Rubisky.  Indeed! > > Wow. > > >  I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and controversy > in > > > various alt groups, as > > >  well as the ritual unease and bad faith. > > > However, when all is said and > > >  done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion > that > > >  adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > > >  gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > > >  genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > > >  called "spanking". > > >  Anyone who demurs or resists this idea is somewhat suspect. After > > all, > > >  this is how we will prove or disprove the assertion – one way or > the > > >  other. > > >  And all that blarney about whether spanking > > >  is "effective", "salutary", "necessary", "unnecessary", etc will > pale > > >  into insignificance faced with the reality of that indecent and > > >  secretive PLEASURE… > > > Before you buy. > > Before you buy. > Before you buy. > Before you buy.

Before you buy.

Response:

> Aint it strange how none of these spankers has the balls to stand up > and take on these arguments yet they all have the balls to wank over > kid’s pain and humiliation & thrill to the sexual perversion of > spanking children.  & aint it funny that all their lies about why they > do it are also a way of getting their pathetic satisfactions in sex, > sex that being so ugly & sexually inadequate and also so fucking stupid > they can’t get nowise else.   & aint it hilarious how these liberal > cunt social worker hippie Clintonite fuckfaces just curl up & die when > you say all this OBVIOUS stuff out loud.  Makes you wonder what makes > them tick too…

Yes you are a disturbed moron. And why are you so hung up on sexual issues that you feel the need to bring them into a parenting discussion? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Indeed Rubisky.  Indeed! > > Wow. > > >  I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and controversy > in > > > various alt groups, as > > >  well as the ritual unease and bad faith. > > > However, when all is said and > > >  done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion > that > > >  adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > > >  gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > > >  genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > > >  called "spanking". > > >  Anyone who demurs or resists this idea is somewhat suspect. After > > all, > > >  this is how we will prove or disprove the assertion – one way or > the > > >  other. > > >  And all that blarney about whether spanking > > >  is "effective", "salutary", "necessary", "unnecessary", etc will > pale > > >  into insignificance faced with the reality of that indecent and > > >  secretive PLEASURE… > > > Before you buy. > > Before you buy. > Before you buy. > Before you buy.

Before you buy.

Response:

Aint it strange how none of these spankers has the balls to stand up and take on these arguments yet they all have the balls to wank over kid’s pain and humiliation & thrill to the sexual perversion of spanking children.  & aint it funny that all their lies about why they do it are also a way of getting their pathetic satisfactions in sex, sex that being so ugly & sexually inadequate and also so fucking stupid they can’t get nowise else.   & aint it hilarious how these liberal cunt social worker hippie Clintonite fuckfaces just curl up & die when you say all this OBVIOUS stuff out loud.  Makes you wonder what makes them tick too… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Indeed Rubisky.  Indeed! > Wow. > >  I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and controversy > in > > various alt groups, as > >  well as the ritual unease and bad faith. > > However, when all is said and > >  done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion > that > >  adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > >  gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > >  genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > >  called "spanking". > >  Anyone who demurs or resists this idea is somewhat suspect. After > all, > >  this is how we will prove or disprove the assertion – one way or > the > >  other. > >  And all that blarney about whether spanking > >  is "effective", "salutary", "necessary", "unnecessary", etc will > pale > >  into insignificance faced with the reality of that indecent and > >  secretive PLEASURE… > > Before you buy. > Before you buy. > Before you buy.

Before you buy.

Response:

"On either side".  But of course, how convenient.  And in this imaginary scenario your hot dick was pressed against which window? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> No one person has the right to lay thier hands on any humanbeing no > matter what.  Hands were made for hugs not hitting!! If you teach your > child to express them selves with violence, then you have no one to > blame for thier behavior except you…… > From Rose, Frank  &  Riley >      Ah that’s a load of crap.  I have neighbors on either side of me > that are perfect examples of what spanking can do.  One neighbor’s kids > were spanked.  The others’ kids were not.  Which ones do you think > turned out like animals and which turned out well-behaved? >      His Excellency, >      The Potentate (NC)

Before you buy.

Response:

Poor Leslie, He thinks we don’t all know JUST HOW he reacts everytime he thinks about spanking kids and his useless skinny wanky willy gets an apology for a hard on, just like every other Christian spanker and every other useless welfare scrounging hippy social working Christian do-gooding Clintonite liberal fascist, poor Willy… I mean, Leslie! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> You my friend should know that not all people react the same nor do they > think the same, Because you have a biological reaction to the situation > doesn’t mean that it happens to all of us. And to suggest mass inspection is > a guide to your warped personality. > All I can say is Kiss my arse weirdo. > Les > Wow. > >  I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and controversy in > > various alt groups, as > >  well as the ritual unease and bad faith. > > However, when all is said and > >  done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion that > >  adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > >  gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > >  genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > >  called "spanking". > >  Anyone who demurs or resists this idea is somewhat suspect. After > all, > >  this is how we will prove or disprove the assertion – one way or the > >  other. > >  And all that blarney about whether spanking > >  is "effective", "salutary", "necessary", "unnecessary", etc will pale > >  into insignificance faced with the reality of that indecent and > >  secretive PLEASURE… > > Before you buy. > Before you buy.

Before you buy.

Response:

> SOME HIGHLIGHTS SO FAR… > I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and controversy, as > well as the ritual unease and bad faith.  However, when all is said and > done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion that > adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > called "spanking".

And since kids get sexually stimulated from being spanked as well then why don’t you want people to do more of it?? Are you frigid or something!! ;-> Steve – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Anyone who demurs or resists this idea is somewhat suspect. After all, > this is how we will prove or disprove the assertion – one way or the > other. > And all that blarney about whether spanking > is "effective", "salutary", "necessary", "unnecessary", etc will pale > into insignificance faced with the reality of that indecent and > secretive PLEASURE… > >OK LET’S TRY AGAIN THIS TIME IN CAPITAL LETTERS FOR ALL THE MORONS: > >ADULTS SPANK CHILDREN TO GET SEXUALLY TURNED ON.  THAT IS THE REASON > >IT HAPPENS.  THAT IS WHY THEY DO IT. THEY DO IT BECAUSE THEY ENJOY > >IT. > >THEY EVEN LOVE IT.  THEY LOVE IT SO MUCH THEY WOULD SAY AND DO > >ANYTHING TO PROTECT THEIR DIRTY LITTLE HABIT.  SPANKING CHILDREN IS > >AN > >ADDICTION. IT IS ALSO ABOUT GETTING SEXUAL PLEASURE BY BRUTE FORCE. > >IT IS THERFORE EQUIVALENT TO RAPE.  THE ONLY REASON THE > >"AUTHORITIES" > >CHARGE PARENTS WHO DO IT – IF THEY EVER DO – WITH SIMPLE ASSAULT > >RATHER THAN SEXUAL ASSAULT, IS THAT THEY ARE SICKO LIBERALS WITH NO > >BALLS. > Yess Yess Yess!!! > >IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH? > Be advised you spankos that we are not the liberal PC cretins you are > used to, we are not interested in any of your reasons, or your excuses, > we are not interested in any debate… pure & simple we know the score > just like you do… and therefore WE ARE AFTER YOUR ASSES… > However, when all is said and > > done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion > that > > adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > > gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > > genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > > called "spanking".

Response:

Watch how "Neil Feldman’s" nasty mouth slavers and slobbers over the question of "spanking", he LOVES LOVES LOVES to discuss this topic just like all the other sexual perverts who use this site as a masturbatory aid.  The point however, is NEVER to engage these people in any sort of discussion.  They are beyond reason and impervious to dialogue. Evetything they say is ipso facto a lie even before it has left their lips because it is a self serving justification of the only thought and activity that can turn these people on.  Don’t even bother to question or ridicule them.  The only way to push the problem on is to relentlessly insist on the obvious: that they are SEXUALLY MOTIVATED, and the only audience that counts for this lesson is the children who arre being molested and tortured.  For them, the only clear message must be: HIT BACK.  Do whatever is necessary to redress your situation, including extreme violence.  And if you do that, we will support you, legally, morally, and finacially.  Everything else and anything less is liberal hogwash. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > SOME HIGHLIGHTS SO FAR… > I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and controversy, as > well as the ritual unease and bad faith.  However, when all is said and > done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion that > adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > called "spanking". > Anyone who demurs or resists this idea is somewhat suspect. After all, > this is how we will prove or disprove the assertion – one way or the > other. > And all that blarney about whether spanking > is "effective", "salutary", "necessary", "unnecessary", etc will pale > into insignificance faced with the reality of that indecent and > secretive PLEASURE… > >OK LET’S TRY AGAIN THIS TIME IN CAPITAL LETTERS FOR ALL THE MORONS: > >ADULTS SPANK CHILDREN TO GET SEXUALLY TURNED ON.  THAT IS THE REASON > >IT HAPPENS.  THAT IS WHY THEY DO IT. THEY DO IT BECAUSE THEY ENJOY > >IT. > >THEY EVEN LOVE IT.  THEY LOVE IT SO MUCH THEY WOULD SAY AND DO > >ANYTHING TO PROTECT THEIR DIRTY LITTLE HABIT.  SPANKING CHILDREN IS > >AN > >ADDICTION. IT IS ALSO ABOUT GETTING SEXUAL PLEASURE BY BRUTE FORCE. > >IT IS THERFORE EQUIVALENT TO RAPE.  THE ONLY REASON THE > >"AUTHORITIES" > >CHARGE PARENTS WHO DO IT – IF THEY EVER DO – WITH SIMPLE ASSAULT > >RATHER THAN SEXUAL ASSAULT, IS THAT THEY ARE SICKO LIBERALS WITH NO > >BALLS. > Yess Yess Yess!!! > >IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH? > Be advised you spankos that we are not the liberal PC cretins you are > used to, we are not interested in any of your reasons, or your excuses, > we are not interested in any debate… pure & simple we know the score > just like you do… and therefore WE ARE AFTER YOUR ASSES… > However, when all is said and > > done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion > that > > adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > > gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > > genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > > called "spanking". > Before you buy.

Before you buy.

Response:

Everyone:  this response was posted by an individual who pretends that parents who spank kids do not do so to get sexual satisfaction from this activity.  Such a claim is demonstrably ridiculous and we would urge you to ignore this so called "Chris", who is evidently a sadistic pedophile trying to promote his fetishistic activities Please ignore all his his postings from now on.  Your co-operation is much appreciated. >    Everyone: this note was posted by the same individual who posts > all the other notes, under various aliases, claiming that all spanking > parents are sexually motivated.  This individual is a fetishist and a > troll who craves attention.  Please do not give it to him.  We beg

you, please do not give the game away.  We spankers just have too much to lose!  Please, stand together on this one at least! > Chris

> : SOME HIGHLIGHTS SO FAR… > : I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and controversy, as > : well as the ritual unease and bad faith.  However, when all is said and > : done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion that > : adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > : gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > : genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > : called "spanking".

Before you buy.

Response:

SOME HIGHLIGHTS SO FAR… I see that my ideas have sparked general interest and controversy, as well as the ritual unease and bad faith.  However, when all is said and done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion that adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction called "spanking". Anyone who demurs or resists this idea is somewhat suspect. After all, this is how we will prove or disprove the assertion – one way or the other. And all that blarney about whether spanking is "effective", "salutary", "necessary", "unnecessary", etc will pale into insignificance faced with the reality of that indecent and secretive PLEASURE… >OK LET’S TRY AGAIN THIS TIME IN CAPITAL LETTERS FOR ALL THE MORONS: >ADULTS SPANK CHILDREN TO GET SEXUALLY TURNED ON.  THAT IS THE REASON >IT HAPPENS.  THAT IS WHY THEY DO IT. THEY DO IT BECAUSE THEY ENJOY >IT. >THEY EVEN LOVE IT.  THEY LOVE IT SO MUCH THEY WOULD SAY AND DO >ANYTHING TO PROTECT THEIR DIRTY LITTLE HABIT.  SPANKING CHILDREN IS >AN >ADDICTION. IT IS ALSO ABOUT GETTING SEXUAL PLEASURE BY BRUTE FORCE. >IT IS THERFORE EQUIVALENT TO RAPE.  THE ONLY REASON THE >"AUTHORITIES" >CHARGE PARENTS WHO DO IT – IF THEY EVER DO – WITH SIMPLE ASSAULT >RATHER THAN SEXUAL ASSAULT, IS THAT THEY ARE SICKO LIBERALS WITH NO >BALLS.

Yess Yess Yess!!! >IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH?

Be advised you spankos that we are not the liberal PC cretins you are used to, we are not interested in any of your reasons, or your excuses, we are not interested in any debate… pure & simple we know the score just like you do… and therefore WE ARE AFTER YOUR ASSES… However, when all is said and > done the only way to prove or disprove the truth of my assertion that > adults ALWAYS derive sexual (sensual – or whatever) pleasure and > gratification from the act of spanking children is to monitor the > genitals of all parties involved in this peculiar transaction > called "spanking".

Before you buy.

Response: