Question:
To be honest I felt it was time these ng’s and the mix of people that posted in them got a shared thread. It gets old flaming you Eric and I felt it was only fair to share you with others. > BTW – why all the crossposts? Are you trolling for attention or > something? > — > Eric Michael Cordian 0+ > O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division > "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
– When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. —Winnie the Pooh
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > after she was coerced > > rape > > attacks > > forced the girl to the same spot and she was attacked again > > They ran away > > I simply posted the article and it seems Eric had to twist it into > > something it was not. > Learn to read. > I posted the damn thing here so you can bet I read it. Learn to note who > posted it. > The article clearly said that the girl left with the > first boy and voluntarily engaged in some sort of sexual activity. > Agreed to have sex not that she volunteered. If you had a gun to my head > right now I would have sex with you any damn way you wanted to but that > agreement would not be one that I volunteered. Now please go to the back of > the class because even though you can read the words you fail to put it all > into context and so the story is lost on you.
It’s a little hard to get a girl to give a proper blowjob if she doesn’t want to, especially in a school building furing school hours. I think she wanted to. > The use of the words "attack" and "coerced" were used to describe this > voluntary activity > Please read what they said of the first child, "The 11-year-old somehow got > the girl to leave the classroom and > go to a foyer area, where she agreed to have sex, police said." > You must be projecting some unmet need to have had some little girl > VOLUNTEER to have sex with you when you were in grade school.
Sure, when I was in grade school I wanted that, just as everyone did. They won’t admit it now, but they did. > by the author of the article, in direct contradiction > to the account he had just related. > The second two boys allegedly forced the girl. The first boy was not > charged with rape, but only with sodomy, and I reiterate that no one > should be charged under antiquated sodomy laws, be they hetero, homo, > or kids. > The charges really do not matter anyway as they are children. Charge them > all with loitering as the result will, I hope, be the same in that they are > not further traumatized by this and have a professional deal with them on > sexual matters.
Better simply to leave them the fuck alone andlet them do what they do in the woods or the park anyway. They should be told to keep it out of the school to keep the prudes from whining and that’s it. Steve
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> —snipped— > > >Sodomy laws make little enough sense when applied to adults. They > > >make even less sense when applied to children. Given today’s > > >zero-tolerance attitudes, I don’t see how kids have a chance to learn > > >how to grow up at all. > > They don’t. But since we want infants not adults, I guess that’s > > the point. > Don’t project what Gov’t *wants* on to "we". What WE need is > responsible parents, active and interested, in the lives of their kids. > That fosters the relationship and communications necessary to forestall > such activities. > I read this three times and I hate to say this but we agree. > I don’t know what to do now.
It’s a VERY antisexual statement. You should be ashamed of agreeing to it. This officious antisexuality is dishonoring of children’s sexual desires. The firs boy and girl should be told not to burden the school with it in this idiotic social climate and be told to take it elsewhere. No police should be involved with the first couple anyway. It’s destructive. If the girl wants to press charges for rape on the other two she should be helped to do so. Steve
Response:
It is funny that not one person picked up on this part of the article, "The attacks happened Monday after the boys’ sixth-grade class was combined with the girl’s fourth-grade class when the teacher for the older students was absent, police spokeswoman Cheryl Cox said." Rather than preaching about how kids should have a place to have sex which is far from what this article is about it would seem someone would be interested that the kids were not harmed by well meaning people’s interventions and that the whole issue of proper supervision of children in school would have been raised. I would expected some age difference discussions of this as it was a 4th grade girl and 6th grade boys. In my area the boys would have been in a middle school while the girl would have been in a elementary school. To me this small age difference is rather large knowing what my kids were like at those ages. I guess thinking of little kids having sex clouded everyone’s brain. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > NEW YORK (AP) — A 9-year-old girl was raped by two 12-year-old > >classmates in a school stairwell hours after she was coerced > "coerced" > into > >having sex in the same area by an 11-year-old boy, police said. > > The 11-year-old has been charged with sodomy while the two older > >boys face rape and sodomy charges. > > The attacks happened Monday after the boys’ sixth-grade class > >was combined with the girl’s fourth-grade class when the teacher > >for the older students was absent, police spokeswoman Cheryl Cox > >said. > > Margie Feinberg, a Board of Education spokeswoman, said the > >classes were combined because the school did not have enough time > >to get a substitute teacher. > > The 11-year-old somehow got the girl to leave the classroom and > >go to a foyer area, where she agreed > "agreed" >to have sex, police said. Two > >hours later, the 12-year-old boys forced the girl to the same spot > >and she was attacked again, police said. > > They ran away when they saw an approaching school aide, who > >summoned a school safety officer. > > It was not the first sexual assault this year at Community > >School 200 in Harlem. On March 30, a 7-year-old boy allegedly > >sodomized a 7-year-old girl, according to police reports. The girl > >was hospitalized and both students are undergoing counseling, > >police said. > > The 7-year-old is too young to be charged, police said. > Interesting that both you and Mr. Cordian posted this same article. > Despite your common interest in it, I suspect you two have very > different takes on what it means. > What’s novel is that in one place she agreed to have sex and in another > place in the article she was coerced. > What this says to me, simply, is that kids should have a safe place to > have sex so they wouldn’t try to take it from each other by force when > they see another kid get "lucky". > The rest of the authoritarian reaction is typical end of 20th century > antisexual darkage bullshit. > Steve
– When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. —Winnie the Pooh
Response:
> —snipped— > >Sodomy laws make little enough sense when applied to adults. They > >make even less sense when applied to children. Given today’s > >zero-tolerance attitudes, I don’t see how kids have a chance to learn > >how to grow up at all. > They don’t. But since we want infants not adults, I guess that’s > the point. > Don’t project what Gov’t *wants* on to "we". What WE need is > responsible parents, active and interested, in the lives of their kids. > That fosters the relationship and communications necessary to forestall > such activities.
I read this three times and I hate to say this but we agree. I don’t know what to do now. > Too bad I’m shouting in the wilderness (in many cases). > NM > Dorothy
– When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. —Winnie the Pooh
Response:
> > after she was coerced > rape > attacks > forced the girl to the same spot and she was attacked again > They ran away > I simply posted the article and it seems Eric had to twist it into > something it was not. > Learn to read.
I posted the damn thing here so you can bet I read it. Learn to note who posted it. > The article clearly said that the girl left with the > first boy and voluntarily engaged in some sort of sexual activity.
Agreed to have sex not that she volunteered. If you had a gun to my head right now I would have sex with you any damn way you wanted to but that agreement would not be one that I volunteered. Now please go to the back of the class because even though you can read the words you fail to put it all into context and so the story is lost on you. > The use of the words "attack" and "coerced" were used to describe this > voluntary activity
Please read what they said of the first child, "The 11-year-old somehow got the girl to leave the classroom and go to a foyer area, where she agreed to have sex, police said." You must be projecting some unmet need to have had some little girl VOLUNTEER to have sex with you when you were in grade school. > by the author of the article, in direct contradiction > to the account he had just related. > The second two boys allegedly forced the girl. The first boy was not > charged with rape, but only with sodomy, and I reiterate that no one > should be charged under antiquated sodomy laws, be they hetero, homo, > or kids.
The charges really do not matter anyway as they are children. Charge them all with loitering as the result will, I hope, be the same in that they are not further traumatized by this and have a professional deal with them on sexual matters. > — > Eric Michael Cordian 0+ > O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division > "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
– When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. —Winnie the Pooh
Response:
> Shotgun or fireblaster?
RPG, all the way!!! AJPDLA
Response:
>> Or that newsreaders don’t have a more personal kill ability. >Well, I wouldn’t tend to go THAT far.
Yer right. I might tend to overuse it … occasionally. Then I’d have to answer the question, "Killing people is too much after how many killings?" >But a "maim" feature would be pretty >cool. :)
Shotgun or fireblaster? Glen (anyone up for net.DOOM?) Appleby — Do not underestimate your abilities. That is your boss’s job. It is your job to find ways around your boss’s roadblocks.
Response:
Well, I wouldn’t tend to go THAT far. But a "maim" feature would be pretty cool. :)
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Or that newsreaders don’t have a more personal kill ability.
Response:
—snipped— >Sodomy laws make little enough sense when applied to adults. They >make even less sense when applied to children. Given today’s >zero-tolerance attitudes, I don’t see how kids have a chance to learn >how to grow up at all. > They don’t. But since we want infants not adults, I guess that’s > the point.
Don’t project what Gov’t *wants* on to "we". What WE need is responsible parents, active and interested, in the lives of their kids. That fosters the relationship and communications necessary to forestall such activities. Too bad I’m shouting in the wilderness (in many cases). NM – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Dorothy
Response:
>I swear, the woman actually thinks she makes sense. >Too bad there isn’t a global IGNORE.
Or that newsreaders don’t have a more personal kill ability. Glen "Reach out and ‘touch’ someone" Appleby — Do not underestimate your abilities. That is your boss’s job. It is your job to find ways around your boss’s roadblocks.
Response:
: : In very underclass areas, rape is a fact of life. I knew a girl who was : raised in a very rough, hard neighborhood. All of her friends were raped : before they hit their teens. : : What little girls did and what she did if they didn’t want to be raped was : they had a special way of pinning their jeans closed from the inside. She : described using a big safety pin and doubling the fabric from the inside. : The idea being that the safety pin closure could slow the boy(s) down long : enough for her to fight and get away. Oh, I see…it’s HER fault because she didn’t know enough to pin her jeans the right way. People, this is SICK. Karen
Response:
I swear, the woman actually thinks she makes sense. Too bad there isn’t a global IGNORE. AJPDLA
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In alt.parenting.solutions Elaine Gallant > : > : In very underclass areas, rape is a fact of life. I knew a girl who was > : raised in a very rough, hard neighborhood. All of her friends were raped > : before they hit their teens. > : > : What little girls did and what she did if they didn’t want to be raped was > : they had a special way of pinning their jeans closed from the inside. She > : described using a big safety pin and doubling the fabric from the inside. > : The idea being that the safety pin closure could slow the boy(s) down long > : enough for her to fight and get away. > Oh, I see…it’s HER fault because she didn’t know enough to > pin her jeans the right way. > People, this is SICK. > Karen
Response:
>> What little girls did and what she did if they didn’t want to be raped was > they had a special way of pinning their jeans closed from the inside. >I hope this doesn’t suggest that the percentage of little girls who >"didn’t want to be raped" was less than 100%
Uhm…Eric? It’s only rape is the person on the receiving end doesn’t want it. , or that someone who didn’t >use this special procedure was inviting sexual activity.
Rape is not a crime of sex. Rape is a crime of violence. Rape is much more about abuse, harassment and control. >It also seems a teensy bit sexist.
Underclass culture is quite sexist. Middleclass views of equality of the genders mean little to these people. Little girls hit puberty earlier and – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->often hit on little boys. Suggesting that it is only the little girls who >need the safety pin is a tad misleading. >As I recall, there were lots of horny 11 and 12 year old girls hitting on >bewildered 11 and 12 year old boys when I was in elementary school. >Although, as far as I can recall, no incidents of actual sex acts during >school hours ever came to light, or if they did, they didn’t make the AP >Wireservice. >– >Eric Michael Cordian 0+ >O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division >"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Response:
> In very underclass areas, rape is a fact of life. I knew a girl who was > raised in a very rough, hard neighborhood. All of her friends were raped > before they hit their teens.
An unfortunate statistic. > What little girls did and what she did if they didn’t want to be raped was > they had a special way of pinning their jeans closed from the inside.
I hope this doesn’t suggest that the percentage of little girls who "didn’t want to be raped" was less than 100%, or that someone who didn’t use this special procedure was inviting sexual activity. It also seems a teensy bit sexist. Little girls hit puberty earlier and often hit on little boys. Suggesting that it is only the little girls who need the safety pin is a tad misleading. As I recall, there were lots of horny 11 and 12 year old girls hitting on bewildered 11 and 12 year old boys when I was in elementary school. Although, as far as I can recall, no incidents of actual sex acts during school hours ever came to light, or if they did, they didn’t make the AP Wireservice. — Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Response:
> so the sodomy and rape of a nine year old is nothing more than children > engaging in sex play??? > My concern, is where did the boys learn this behavior? Obviously they had to > have learned about sodomy somewhere, because most children see the rectum as > a place where waste comes from, not a place to f*ck..
Gee, me and my brother figured it out without ever reading anything about it at the time!! > So my concern is for that girl, but also, where these boys learned that > from..
From their DICKS you stupid asshole!! And maybe a magazine or two, but mostly from their DICKS!! This idiot imagines sex comes only from knowledge and that if we keep them ignorant they’ll never figure it out! Stupid! And why would their "sex play" be done in school?? They’re there and have a free moment… why not? ;-> > There is something seriously wrong when kids not only have to worry about > adults hurting them, but now also worry about other kids hurting them..
Well, sex and violence are linked in this society precisely because this society does violence to people who are only trying to have sex. Steve – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Interesting that both you and Mr. Cordian posted this same article. > > Despite your common interest in it, I suspect you two have very > > different takes on what it means. > I just think it’s interesting that 100 year old sodomy laws, which most > people think should be wiped off the books, are getting new life now as > weapons against small children engaging in sex play. > — > Eric Michael Cordian 0+ > O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division > "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Response:
> > NEW YORK (AP) — A 9-year-old girl was raped by two 12-year-old >classmates in a school stairwell hours after she was coerced
"coerced" > into >having sex in the same area by an 11-year-old boy, police said. > The 11-year-old has been charged with sodomy while the two older >boys face rape and sodomy charges. > The attacks happened Monday after the boys’ sixth-grade class >was combined with the girl’s fourth-grade class when the teacher >for the older students was absent, police spokeswoman Cheryl Cox >said. > Margie Feinberg, a Board of Education spokeswoman, said the >classes were combined because the school did not have enough time >to get a substitute teacher. > The 11-year-old somehow got the girl to leave the classroom and >go to a foyer area, where she agreed
"agreed" >to have sex, police said. Two >hours later, the 12-year-old boys forced the girl to the same spot >and she was attacked again, police said. > They ran away when they saw an approaching school aide, who >summoned a school safety officer. > It was not the first sexual assault this year at Community >School 200 in Harlem. On March 30, a 7-year-old boy allegedly >sodomized a 7-year-old girl, according to police reports. The girl >was hospitalized and both students are undergoing counseling, >police said. > The 7-year-old is too young to be charged, police said. > Interesting that both you and Mr. Cordian posted this same article. > Despite your common interest in it, I suspect you two have very > different takes on what it means.
What’s novel is that in one place she agreed to have sex and in another place in the article she was coerced. What this says to me, simply, is that kids should have a safe place to have sex so they wouldn’t try to take it from each other by force when they see another kid get "lucky". The rest of the authoritarian reaction is typical end of 20th century antisexual darkage bullshit. Steve
Response:
In very underclass areas, rape is a fact of life. I knew a girl who was raised in a very rough, hard neighborhood. All of her friends were raped before they hit their teens. What little girls did and what she did if they didn’t want to be raped was they had a special way of pinning their jeans closed from the inside. She described using a big safety pin and doubling the fabric from the inside. The idea being that the safety pin closure could slow the boy(s) down long enough for her to fight and get away. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> so the sodomy and rape of a nine year old is nothing more than children > engaging in sex play??? >First of all, "Sodomy" is simply a term which describes anything other >than standard penile/vaginal intercourse between one male and one female. >It covers everything from blowjobs to sex with livestock. >If the rape charges against the 2 12 year olds are substantiated, then >that is a serious matter, and not sex play. >However, the first boy is not charged with rape, and the use of antiquated >sodomy laws, which are a throwback to the dark ages, to create legal >problems for him, is inappropriate. >Especially in light of the fact that almost all sex-positive sex education >programs encourage "outercourse", "alternatives to intercourse", and other >euphemisms for non-intercourse ways of expressing affection for younger >kids who choose to be sexually active. >Since intercourse doesn’t usually become the most common form of sexual >expression til the middle to late teens, the last thing we need to be >doing is calling other forms of sexual expression by kids using >emotionally-loaded terms like "sodomy." > My concern, is where did the boys learn this behavior? Obviously they > had to have learned about sodomy somewhere, because most children see > the rectum as a place where waste comes from, not a place to f*ck.. >I doubt we’re talking about the rectum here. Of course, the press is not >going to ever say precisely what the kids did, because they would rather >the public imagine something far worse that what actually happened. > So my concern is for that girl, but also, where these boys learned that > from.. And why would their "sex play" be done in school?? >Kids spend a huge amount of time in school. It is hardly surprising that >most of their socialization would occur there, expecially if they live in >poorer neighborhoods without many recreational resources, or where it >isn’t safe for them to venture outdoors. >You seem to be parroting the usual victimologist nonsense that minors have >no natural interest in sexual expression unless they have been >"sexualized" by an adult pervert. > There is something seriously wrong when kids not only have to worry about > adults hurting them, but now also worry about other kids hurting them.. >Kids shouldn’t have to worry about anyone hurting them. That doesn’t mean >we need to redefine the occasional sexual liason with a peer as "abuse" or >"sodomy." >This case is complicated by the fact that the girl was allegedly raped >after agreeing to have sex with someone else earlier. This kind of smears >the first boy with the actions of the second and third. >It would be a grave miscarriage of justice if the first boy finds himself >on a sex offender registry for the rest of his life at age 11, simply >because he decided to engage in some exploration with another child in an >unsupervised stairwell. >– >Eric Michael Cordian 0+ >O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division >"Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Response:
> so the sodomy and rape of a nine year old is nothing more than children > engaging in sex play???
First of all, "Sodomy" is simply a term which describes anything other than standard penile/vaginal intercourse between one male and one female. It covers everything from blowjobs to sex with livestock. If the rape charges against the 2 12 year olds are substantiated, then that is a serious matter, and not sex play. However, the first boy is not charged with rape, and the use of antiquated sodomy laws, which are a throwback to the dark ages, to create legal problems for him, is inappropriate. Especially in light of the fact that almost all sex-positive sex education programs encourage "outercourse", "alternatives to intercourse", and other euphemisms for non-intercourse ways of expressing affection for younger kids who choose to be sexually active. Since intercourse doesn’t usually become the most common form of sexual expression til the middle to late teens, the last thing we need to be doing is calling other forms of sexual expression by kids using emotionally-loaded terms like "sodomy." > My concern, is where did the boys learn this behavior? Obviously they > had to have learned about sodomy somewhere, because most children see > the rectum as a place where waste comes from, not a place to f*ck..
I doubt we’re talking about the rectum here. Of course, the press is not going to ever say precisely what the kids did, because they would rather the public imagine something far worse that what actually happened. > So my concern is for that girl, but also, where these boys learned that > from.. And why would their "sex play" be done in school??
Kids spend a huge amount of time in school. It is hardly surprising that most of their socialization would occur there, expecially if they live in poorer neighborhoods without many recreational resources, or where it isn’t safe for them to venture outdoors. You seem to be parroting the usual victimologist nonsense that minors have no natural interest in sexual expression unless they have been "sexualized" by an adult pervert. > There is something seriously wrong when kids not only have to worry about > adults hurting them, but now also worry about other kids hurting them..
Kids shouldn’t have to worry about anyone hurting them. That doesn’t mean we need to redefine the occasional sexual liason with a peer as "abuse" or "sodomy." This case is complicated by the fact that the girl was allegedly raped after agreeing to have sex with someone else earlier. This kind of smears the first boy with the actions of the second and third. It would be a grave miscarriage of justice if the first boy finds himself on a sex offender registry for the rest of his life at age 11, simply because he decided to engage in some exploration with another child in an unsupervised stairwell. — Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Response:
BTW – why all the crossposts? Are you trolling for attention or something? — Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Response:
> > Interesting that both you and Mr. Cordian posted this same article. > Despite your common interest in it, I suspect you two have very > different takes on what it means. > I just think it’s interesting that 100 year old sodomy laws, which most > people think should be wiped off the books, are getting new life now as > weapons against small children engaging in sex play.
This is not about sex play but in the use of force. Let me quote some words that Eric looks over: after she was coerced rape attacks forced the girl to the same spot and she was attacked again They ran away I simply posted the article and it seems Eric had to twist it into something it was not. > — > Eric Michael Cordian 0+ > O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division > "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
– When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. —Winnie the Pooh
Response:
> after she was coerced > rape > attacks > forced the girl to the same spot and she was attacked again > They ran away > I simply posted the article and it seems Eric had to twist it into > something it was not.
Learn to read. The article clearly said that the girl left with the first boy and voluntarily engaged in some sort of sexual activity. The use of the words "attack" and "coerced" were used to describe this voluntary activity by the author of the article, in direct contradiction to the account he had just related. The second two boys allegedly forced the girl. The first boy was not charged with rape, but only with sodomy, and I reiterate that no one should be charged under antiquated sodomy laws, be they hetero, homo, or kids. — Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Response:
> Interesting that both you and Mr. Cordian posted this same article. > Despite your common interest in it, I suspect you two have very > different takes on what it means.
I just think it’s interesting that 100 year old sodomy laws, which most people think should be wiped off the books, are getting new life now as weapons against small children engaging in sex play. — Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> NEW YORK (AP) — A 9-year-old girl was raped by two 12-year-old >classmates in a school stairwell hours after she was coerced into >having sex in the same area by an 11-year-old boy, police said. > The 11-year-old has been charged with sodomy while the two older >boys face rape and sodomy charges. > The attacks happened Monday after the boys’ sixth-grade class >was combined with the girl’s fourth-grade class when the teacher >for the older students was absent, police spokeswoman Cheryl Cox >said. > Margie Feinberg, a Board of Education spokeswoman, said the >classes were combined because the school did not have enough time >to get a substitute teacher. > The 11-year-old somehow got the girl to leave the classroom and >go to a foyer area, where she agreed to have sex, police said. Two >hours later, the 12-year-old boys forced the girl to the same spot >and she was attacked again, police said. > They ran away when they saw an approaching school aide, who >summoned a school safety officer. > It was not the first sexual assault this year at Community >School 200 in Harlem. On March 30, a 7-year-old boy allegedly >sodomized a 7-year-old girl, according to police reports. The girl >was hospitalized and both students are undergoing counseling, >police said. > The 7-year-old is too young to be charged, police said. > Interesting that both you and Mr. Cordian posted this same article. > Despite your common interest in it, I suspect you two have very > different takes on what it means.
You can put all your money on that one as I think I have agreed with Eric once on a minor point in all this time. — When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. —Winnie the Pooh
Response:
NEW YORK (AP) — A 9-year-old girl was raped by two 12-year-old classmates in a school stairwell hours after she was coerced into having sex in the same area by an 11-year-old boy, police said. The 11-year-old has been charged with sodomy while the two older boys face rape and sodomy charges. The attacks happened Monday after the boys’ sixth-grade class was combined with the girl’s fourth-grade class when the teacher for the older students was absent, police spokeswoman Cheryl Cox said. Margie Feinberg, a Board of Education spokeswoman, said the classes were combined because the school did not have enough time to get a substitute teacher. The 11-year-old somehow got the girl to leave the classroom and go to a foyer area, where she agreed to have sex, police said. Two hours later, the 12-year-old boys forced the girl to the same spot and she was attacked again, police said. They ran away when they saw an approaching school aide, who summoned a school safety officer. It was not the first sexual assault this year at Community School 200 in Harlem. On March 30, a 7-year-old boy allegedly sodomized a 7-year-old girl, according to police reports. The girl was hospitalized and both students are undergoing counseling, police said. The 7-year-old is too young to be charged, police said. — When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it. —Winnie the Pooh
If you like this post and would like to receive updates from this blog, please subscribe our feed.