Pure Parents

Question:

[...] >:You are confused.  The "Pure Silk" alleged person evidently has a >:problem with people using Nora Peal’s child in flames.  Yet she (and >:you — and all know that you are one and the same) do the very thing >:you deplore.

Please post your proof that I’m an ‘alleged’ person… I have a problem with Nora Peal using her child in flames.. She used her 28 month old to flame her ‘net enemies, and she never apologized for doing so..You would think if she has a vendetta agains someone she would at least have the decency to leave her child out of it. >:> >:>what could be more despicable than using your own >:>child to flame? >: >:How is it different when you do the same thing?

Keegan isn’t using anyone’s child to flame, neither am I before you start saying so.. >: >:Change your tune, Jimmy, or explain your clearly hypocritical stance. >:Your argument is no more effective now than it was three months ago. >:– >:                           The Prince of Lies >:"As you see, I have a bit of influence over here.  People listen to me. >:They RESPECT me, Koputz.  They KNEEL BEFORE ME IN TERROR.  They COWER >:IN THEIR GODDAMNED CELLARS AT MY APPROACH.  They TELL THEIR CHILDREN >:THAT IF THEY ARE BAD, THE BIG MEAN PAUL ZANCA GUY WILL COME AND FLAME >:THEIR MISERABLE LIVES INTO OBSCURITY.  They CONDUCT SECRET RITUALS TO >:APPEASE MY SAVAGE BLOODLUST, AND I IGNORE THEM ALL, AND I RAGE AMONG >:THEM AND BITE AND TEAR AND MAUL AND STOMP AND CRUSH AND DESTROY… >: >:"NNNGAARRRGLNKKRRAARGH  *kkkkchoke* ….."

Anyone can ell what a looney tune you are, just by reading your stupid .sig file.. The problem is, he LIKES saying "fuckhead" so much that he’s devised a new game … he’ll run up to my monitor, tap it, and ask "Is keegan in there?" [shudder].  I say "yes".  Then he gets a sly look on his face and asks "who is it?" so that when I reply "keegan" he can shout "FUCKHEAD!" with glee. Nora Peal (No APeal) bragging about her 28 mo.old’s ability to use profanity, which he developed as a result of her ‘parenting’ skills.

Response:

>>:You are confused.  The "Pure Silk" alleged person evidently has a >:problem with people using Nora Peal’s child in flames.  Yet she (and >:you — and all know that you are one and the same) do the very thing >:you deplore. >Please post your proof that I’m an ‘alleged’ person…

Bwahahah.  Post proof that you’re not James Keegan, since pretty much everyone knows you are. >I have a problem with Nora Peal using her child in flames..

But obviously you think it’s fine when you do it.  What’s the matter? Can’t you live up to your own standards? >She used her 28 month old to flame her ‘net enemies,

…and so did you… >and she never apologized for doing so..

…and neither did you… >You would think if she has a vendetta agains >someone she would at least have the decency to leave her child out of >it.

And your reason for doing the thing you feel is so wrong is…? If you feel that it is wrong to use Mrs. Peal’s children in flames, then surely you see how incredibly stupid you look when you do exactly that. >:> >:>what could be more despicable than using your own >:>child to flame? >: >:How is it different when you do the same thing? >Keegan isn’t using anyone’s child to flame,

Obviously you can’t understand what you/he writes.  This is perfectly understandable, since neither can anyone else without referring to a text on how to interpret the rantings of psychopaths. Fortunately I also happen to be a ranting psychopath, so I don’t need a book. >neither am I before you start saying so..

A)  You certainly are, and B)  You and Jimmy are one and the same anyhow. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->: >:Change your tune, Jimmy, or explain your clearly hypocritical stance. >:Your argument is no more effective now than it was three months ago. >:– >:                           The Prince of Lies >:"As you see, I have a bit of influence over here.  People listen to me. >:They RESPECT me, Koputz.  They KNEEL BEFORE ME IN TERROR.  They COWER >:IN THEIR GODDAMNED CELLARS AT MY APPROACH.  They TELL THEIR CHILDREN >:THAT IF THEY ARE BAD, THE BIG MEAN PAUL ZANCA GUY WILL COME AND FLAME >:THEIR MISERABLE LIVES INTO OBSCURITY.  They CONDUCT SECRET RITUALS TO >:APPEASE MY SAVAGE BLOODLUST, AND I IGNORE THEM ALL, AND I RAGE AMONG >:THEM AND BITE AND TEAR AND MAUL AND STOMP AND CRUSH AND DESTROY… >: >:"NNNGAARRRGLNKKRRAARGH  *kkkkchoke* ….." >Anyone can ell what a looney tune you are, just by reading your stupid >.sig file..

Heh.  Isn’t that convenient? >The problem is, he LIKES saying "xxxxhead" so much that he’s

Tsk tsk tsk.  Didn’t we go through this when you got LART’d by Pacbell for crossposting profanity into misc.kids a while back? Here we go again. Readers of alt.parents and alt.parenting.solutions, if the "Pure Silk" alleged person’s habit of crossposting profanity into newsgroups where it knows that its actions are unwelcome and off-charter offend you, then all you have to do to rid yourself of it is complain to Good day. PS:  Followups redirected to alt dot flame, where this discussion is appropriate.  Of course, the "Pure Silk" alleged person will override my effort to move this conversation elsewhere and continue to pollute your newsgroup with its hatemongering. —                    The Prince of Lies "Everyone looks foolish when engaging in personal flames on serious newsgroups. "

Response: