Question:

Does anyone have any suggestions, my three year old daughter is having nightmares about what is happenning to her while she is at day care and she does not want to stay at day care.  Please help me.

Response:

I would take this very seriously.  Is your daughter able explain to you what is happening at day care or what her nightmare was about?  Have you talked to your day care provider about what might be going on?  Perhaps you can visit the day care at unannounced times during the day to try to figure out what is happening.  Maybe you could talk to some of the other parents who have their children at the same day care to see if their children are exhibiting anxious/fearful behavior.   The reason I would take this very seriously is that separation anxiety normally does not manifest itself in nightmares.  Usually, children who do not like day care make their feelings known through complaining that they don’t feel well in the mornings, whine about having to go, cling to their parents, and cry when being dropped off.  The fact that she wakes up in the middle of the night with a nightmare would make me think that something or someone is traumatizing her at day care.  Try to find out what this could be. Good luck! Margaret – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Does anyone have any suggestions, my three year old daughter is having > nightmares about what is happenning to her while she is at day care and > she does not want to stay at day care.     Please help me.

Response:

If her daycare experience is bad enough that she has nightmares, you should seriously consider changing daycare providers.  At the very least, you should try to talk to her and discover what the problem is.  A 3-yr-old is usually articulate enough to give you SOME idea – Is it the care giver?  Is it another child?  Is the the big, scary clown picture on the wall?  Did the caregiver tell some scary story about what would happen if she was bad? (e.g. I’ll put you in the trash and the trash man will get and take you away in the trash truck.) Talk to your care giver about this and see if you can discern the problem. If the care giver downplays your child’s fears, then definitely start looking for another place. — -Kay-    (It’s an ADD thing.  You wouldn’t underst-  Hey!  Look at that!) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Does anyone have any suggestions, my three year old daughter is having > nightmares about what is happenning to her while she is at day care and > she does not want to stay at day care.     Please help me.

Response:

> Does anyone have any suggestions, my three year old daughter is having > nightmares about what is happenning to her while she is at day care > and > she does not want to stay at day care.  Please help me. > –

This is something you should take very seriously.  You should have a one on one with your daughter.  Make her feel as if she can tell you anything, and you will understand.  Ask her about her day, and question her about certain events.  I would talk to the director and many care providers within the day care.  Maybe even take a day off work and spend it with her in the day care facility.  Do the nightmares include certain people within the day care like adults or other children?  This could be your key.  Your child could be having a bad experience in this day care.  Don’t feel like you are over reacting to this issue.  After all this is your precious child.  Good luck – I hope things are resolved soon.  Please write the group and let us know what is happening. Marsha – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

Question:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hi everyone…. > … >However….I am >now getting upwards of 50 to 60 garbage email advertisements in my mail >box every stinking day and I am tired of it. > … > … >If this is what being on the internet is all about >then the marketers can keep it. >                       Annie W > No, this is what living in the real world is all about. > Delete the junkmail (throw it away) or get yourself an e-mail > filter.

Or, you could put something in your address, like in mine, it works (sofar). — H

Question:

geez…I can’t believe that this crap is still going on.  Don’t ya all have lives?  THe kid must be married with children of his own by now…. goodness – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> obviously, ms. peal posted to the newsgroups she felt were > appropriate for her post. that is a reasonable thing to do. sadly, > as you’ll see below, ms. peal wishes to censor others for doing > the same thing. > : : —–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—– > : : > : : > : : > : : ===begin 100% restore of keegan text > : : > : : is pretending it never happened similar to pretending a rape never > : : happened? > : : > : : have you seen ms. peal even acknowledge her mistreatment and > : : misuse of her child? > : > : I have never mistreated or misused my child.  Your accusations > : are both dishonest and slanderous. > your quotes gleefully detailing such abuse have been posted and > reposted dozens of times. your denials now only highlight your > dishonesty, or worse. > : : if no one mentions it, will it go away? > : > : It was never there to begin with, oh Master of Misrepresentation. > again, your quotes gleefully detailing such abuse have been posted > and reposted dozens of times. your denials now only highlight your > dishonesty, or worse. > :   > : : =====end restore of keegan text > : : > : : : Mr. Keegan, it has been explained to you (by the Netcom Abuse > : : : Department, back before they kicked you off) that your habit of > : : : crossposting profanity into newsgroups where it is off-charter is > : : : something that can get you into trouble with your provider. > : : > : : zanca is a self-admitted liar and forger. > : > : The only people supporting you > did not zanca describe himself on more than one occasion as both a > liar and a forger? > : : > : : "I will fight him with forgery, I will fight him with lies and > i believe you have posted similar remarks from zanca, ms. peal. > why do you now defend such actions? > is it because zanca posts in support of the manner in which you > (mis)treat your child? > : > : : he proved that in his remark above and in his remarks below. to > : : demonstrate his blatant dishonesty, i restored all of the text i > : : wrote in the post to which zanca replied. > : : > : : : Complaint mail regarding your activities will be sent to your > : : : postmaster by me for each and every infraction you insist on > : : : committing.  Probably by other readers of alt.parents and > : : : alt.parenting.solutions as well. > : : > : : here, zanca encourages those taken in by his lies, forgery, or > : : both, to harass an internet service provider with the apparent > : : hope that he can fool some readers to help him conduct his > : : censorship activities. > : > : There is no censorship involved in xposting profanity to groups > : where it is off-charter.   > unfortunately for you and zanca, my restored text contains no such > language. if one were to look at your text, or at zanca’s, that > would not be the case, of course. in fact you took pleasure in > teaching your baby to use obscenities to revile your net enemies. > no, ms. peal, your efforts an censorship are designed to > intimidate readers into silence with regard to your parenting. > : : i suggest that any of you who are concerned about zanca’s > : : lies, forgeries or threats of violence or harassment of isps > : : might contact the administrator of the organization through > : : which zanca currently posts at this address:   > : : > : > : I suggest that the people who want your personal vendetta off > : of their groups do exactly the same thing to you > well of course you do dear! as i said you and zanca wish to > silence anyone who criticizes your parenting, of one can call it > parenting.

Response:

> : Followups reset to appropriate groups. > ms. peal apparently thinks it is appropriate for her to post > to the same groups she criticizes others for posting to. it’s no > surprise that she didn’t hold herself to the same standard she > demands of others.

She would make an excellent keeganite.  Oh wait!  She was a keeganite once before…   > obviously, ms. peal posted to the newsgroups she felt were > appropriate for her post. that is a reasonable thing to do. sadly, > as you’ll see below, ms. peal wishes to censor others for doing > the same thing.

That’s just like when you criticize the Peals for using children or family in flames while you use children and family in your flames. > : I have never mistreated or misused my child.  Your accusations > : are both dishonest and slanderous. > your quotes gleefully detailing such abuse have been posted and > reposted dozens of times.

Those quotes are abusive of you.  I hate when you’re so obviously unaware when people are poking fun at you. I hate to see you made such a fool of.  :-( She is not abusing the child, she is abusing you.  Try to remember. > your denials now only highlight your > dishonesty, or worse.

Is that why you’ve never denied being a f**khead? > : : if no one mentions it, will it go away?

That’s the reason why folks refer to you as "f**khead". > : It was never there to begin with, oh Master of Misrepresentation. > again, your quotes gleefully detailing such abuse have been posted > and reposted dozens of times.

You have been the most abused.  You are the victim.  Don’t be afraid jim, let us use you to illustrate how you have suffered from being flamed by Nora.  She sure has been harder on you than anyone else, that’s fer sure.   > your denials now only highlight your > dishonesty, or worse.

"i note that you didn’t deny" Not denying is bad too.  Hey!  You’re pretty slimey, keegan.   I like that. > : : =====end restore of keegan text > : : > : : : Mr. Keegan, it has been explained to you (by the Netcom Abuse > : : : Department, back before they kicked you off) that your habit of > : : : crossposting profanity into newsgroups where it is off-charter is > : : : something that can get you into trouble with your provider. > : : > : : zanca is a self-admitted liar and forger. > : > : The only people supporting you

"Excuse me, but you *did* make an unmarked deletion….  It appears that you are intentionally trying to deceive….." Damn!!  I wish "Pure Silk" had never said that! Makes you look bad. Also, a little suggestion,..  you look bad when you go to the trouble of restoring unmarked deletions and then make your own unmarked deletions in the same thread.   I’m hoping such blatant hypocrisy will be overlooked.   ’cause I think you’re such a cool guy. > did not zanca describe himself on more than one occasion as both a > liar and a forger?

He could have been lying, though.  (just covering your butt there keegan) [BIG snip] > in fact you took pleasure in > teaching your baby to use obscenities to revile your net enemies.

Not many people are aware of your unearthly ability to transcend vast distances by way of astral projection and suspend your disembodied spirit above the computer desks of certain persons and the peer into their minds and read their emotions. Have you ever wondered if perhaps your vision was brought on by some other more ordinary means, such as a couple hits of acid or even a piece of undigested meat? Or both? That would make you something like a deadhead scrooge. Not a bad image for you, imo. > no, ms. peal, your efforts an censorship are designed to > intimidate readers into silence with regard to your parenting.

Doesn’t she recognize that readers are very interested in reading your six-month long obsession with the same subject. Beating a dead horse indeed!   Doesn’t anyone beside me realize you’re going for a world record. I offer my full support, and the support of my family. I want to see you make it!! Go keegan, GO! > : : i suggest that any of you who are concerned about zanca’s > : : lies, forgeries or threats of violence or harassment of isps > : : might contact the administrator of the organization through > : : which zanca currently posts at this address:   > : : > : > : I suggest that the people who want your personal vendetta off > : of their groups do exactly the same thing to you > well of course you do dear! as i said you and zanca wish to > silence anyone who criticizes your parenting, of one can call it > parenting

You cannot be silenced, keegan.  That’s what I love about you. That’s what the net loves about you too. —    Kegan’s Worst Defender

Response:

[...] > clearly zanca’s attempt to manipulate readers into complaining > over non-existent abuse could have the effect of mailbombing an > internet service provider,

No doubt you are concerned that there are a large number of readers who will object to your off-topic posts to alt.parents and alt.parenting.solutions. —    Kegan’s Worst Defender

Response:

: Followups reset to appropriate groups. ms. peal apparently thinks it is appropriate for her to post to the same groups she criticizes others for posting to. it’s no surprise that she didn’t hold herself to the same standard she demands of others. obviously, ms. peal posted to the newsgroups she felt were appropriate for her post. that is a reasonable thing to do. sadly, as you’ll see below, ms. peal wishes to censor others for doing the same thing. : : —–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—– : :

: : : : : : ===begin 100% restore of keegan text : : : : is pretending it never happened similar to pretending a rape never : : happened? : : : : have you seen ms. peal even acknowledge her mistreatment and : : misuse of her child? : : I have never mistreated or misused my child.  Your accusations : are both dishonest and slanderous. your quotes gleefully detailing such abuse have been posted and reposted dozens of times. your denials now only highlight your dishonesty, or worse. : : if no one mentions it, will it go away? : : It was never there to begin with, oh Master of Misrepresentation. again, your quotes gleefully detailing such abuse have been posted and reposted dozens of times. your denials now only highlight your dishonesty, or worse. :   : : =====end restore of keegan text : : : : : Mr. Keegan, it has been explained to you (by the Netcom Abuse : : : Department, back before they kicked you off) that your habit of : : : crossposting profanity into newsgroups where it is off-charter is : : : something that can get you into trouble with your provider. : : : : zanca is a self-admitted liar and forger. : : The only people supporting you did not zanca describe himself on more than one occasion as both a liar and a forger? : : : : "I will fight him with forgery, I will fight him with lies and i believe you have posted similar remarks from zanca, ms. peal. why do you now defend such actions? is it because zanca posts in support of the manner in which you (mis)treat your child? : : : he proved that in his remark above and in his remarks below. to : : demonstrate his blatant dishonesty, i restored all of the text i : : wrote in the post to which zanca replied. : : : : : Complaint mail regarding your activities will be sent to your : : : postmaster by me for each and every infraction you insist on : : : committing.  Probably by other readers of alt.parents and : : : alt.parenting.solutions as well. : : : : here, zanca encourages those taken in by his lies, forgery, or : : both, to harass an internet service provider with the apparent : : hope that he can fool some readers to help him conduct his : : censorship activities. : : There is no censorship involved in xposting profanity to groups : where it is off-charter.   unfortunately for you and zanca, my restored text contains no such language. if one were to look at your text, or at zanca’s, that would not be the case, of course. in fact you took pleasure in teaching your baby to use obscenities to revile your net enemies. no, ms. peal, your efforts an censorship are designed to intimidate readers into silence with regard to your parenting. : : i suggest that any of you who are concerned about zanca’s : : lies, forgeries or threats of violence or harassment of isps : : might contact the administrator of the organization through : : which zanca currently posts at this address:   : : : : I suggest that the people who want your personal vendetta off : of their groups do exactly the same thing to you well of course you do dear! as i said you and zanca wish to silence anyone who criticizes your parenting, of one can call it parenting.

Response:

>> The child actually was 28 months. But still that is an awfully young > age to be learning the use of profanity. > But unfortunately, that’s exactly what Mrs. Peal did… >This stuff is MONTHS old….why are you dragging it back out other than >trolling????

Cuz she is a pathetic, no-life hatemonger. —                     The Prince of Lies "Fear me!  For I am a badass!"

Response:

>I think the Peals also had that in mind, well maybe not the actual >killing of Mr. Keegan,

Sheesh, they’re kinder than I am then.  I’d tell ‘em to empty the magazine first and then drag the corpse inside the house, so as to keep things neat and tidy with the Federales. You/Keegan are a very disturbed person.  It bothers me that you are not kept under heavy sedation. >but certainly Nora clearly shows intentions of >teaching her child violence when she made *this* remark… >You are, of course, assuming that his teacher survived >the Show And Tell day Logan brought his machete AND

Weren’t you just saying that using children to flame was wrong? Can’t maintain a coherent thought through a single article, can you? —                     The Prince of Lies "Fear me!  For I am a badass!"

Response:

>>:Well, I’m not sure what the best way to bring kids up is, really, but >:teaching them to hate Keegan is a good start… >: >:Peter >So you *condone* teaching kids to *hate*?

Where you/Jimmy Keegan are concerned, it makes perfect sense. >IMO, there already is too much hatred in the world,

Odd, since you spend so much time trying to spread it to groups like alt.parents and alt.parenting.solutions.  Are you always this hypocritical? >certainly people have the right to dislike someone, but there >certainly is no reason to *hate* and condone teachings of hate.

You are laughably naive. —                     The Prince of Lies "Fear me!  For I am a badass!"

Response:

>:>> The child actually was 28 months. But still that is an awfully young >:>> age to be learning the use of profanity. >:>> >:>> But unfortunately, that’s exactly what Mrs. Peal did… >:> >:> >:> >:>This stuff is MONTHS old….why are you dragging it back out other than >:>trolling???? >: >:Cuz she is a pathetic, no-life hatemonger.

On the contrary, no one is dragging it back out, it has never been settled in the first place..If anyone is a hatemonger, it would be Mrs. Peal, since she was the one who brought her *own* child into her personal flamewars. >:– >:                    The Prince of Lies >:"Fear me!  For I am a badass!"

Why would someone fear an admitted liar and forger?  "I’ll happily admit, and even proudly proclaim (!)   that I’m a liar (yes, I really am!) and a forger   (no shit!  I forge all kinds of stuff whenever I want!)"

Response:

>:>>:Well, I’m not sure what the best way to bring kids up is, really, but >:>>:teaching them to hate Keegan is a good start… >:>>:Peter >:>So you *condone* teaching kids to *hate*? >:Where you/Jimmy Keegan are concerned, it makes perfect sense.

Does it really make sense to *hate* anyone,regardless who it is? >: >:>IMO, there already is too much hatred in the world, >: >:Odd, since you spend so much time trying to spread it to groups like >:alt.parents and alt.parenting.solutions.  Are you always this >:hypocritical?

Hypocritical? alt.parents, and alt.parenting solutions are deemed appropriate groups to discuss parenting techniques and skills/or lack of, parenting skills, which is exactly what I’m doing… >: >:>certainly people have the right to dislike someone, but there >:>certainly is no reason to *hate* and condone teachings of hate. >: >:You are laughably naive.

So you think it’s the norm for parents to teach their children to be abusive at a very young age? The problem is, he LIKES saying "fuckhead" so much that he’s devised a new game … he’ll run up to my monitor, tap it, and ask "Is keegan in there?" [shudder].  I say "yes".  Then he gets a sly look on his face and asks "who is it?" so that when I reply "keegan" he can shout "FUCKHEAD!" with glee. Nora Peal (No APeal) bragging about her 28 mo.old’s ability to use profanity, which he developed as a result of her ‘parenting’ skills.

Response:

>:> >:For anyone to encourage a small child (what, 18 months?) to use language >:> >:such as "fuckhead" is just plain abusive. >:> >:What kind of moron thinks it OK for kids to talk like that? >:> >:Oze >:> The child actually was 28 months. But still that is an awfully young >:> age to be learning the use of profanity. >:> But unfortunately, that’s exactly what Mrs. Peal did… >:This stuff is MONTHS old….why are you dragging it back out other than >:trolling????

Feel free make use of your killfile! Ciao!

Response:

>:>I think the Peals also had that in mind, well maybe not the actual >:>killing of Mr. Keegan, >: >:Sheesh, they’re kinder than I am then.  I’d tell ‘em to empty the >:magazine first and then drag the corpse inside the house, so as to >:keep things neat and tidy with the Federales.

Sounds like you have some clearly serious head problems Mr. Zanca.. >:You/Keegan are a very disturbed person.  It bothers me that you are >:not kept under heavy sedation.

It bothers me that there are people like you running loose urging others to kill and commit suicide… >: >:>but certainly Nora clearly shows intentions of >:>teaching her child violence when she made *this* remark… >:> >:>You are, of course, assuming that his teacher survived >:>the Show And Tell day Logan brought his machete AND >:> >:Weren’t you just saying that using children to flame was wrong?

Exactly my point..so, why did Nora use her child to flame? >: >:Can’t maintain a coherent thought through a single article, can you?

I’m a lot more coherent than you are… You need to get a grip on yourself!

Response:

[...] > So you think it’s the norm for parents to teach their children to be > abusive at a very young age?

Do you think it’s the norm for a desperate spinster to use another person’s child in her pursuit of petty self-esteem building? > The problem is, he LIKES saying "fuckhead" so much that he’s

What part of that do you have troubles reading, Pure Skank? —        TJ Miller jr.        http://www.spark.org/        "Tommorrow, we’ll seize the day and throttle it"        -from Calvin and Hobbes

Response:

> [...] > So you think it’s the norm for parents to teach their children to be > abusive at a very young age? > Do you think it’s the norm for a desperate spinster to use another > person’s child in her pursuit of petty self-esteem building?

Spark, it’s almost not worth the effort. She (?) is obviously childless and is projecting her ill-informed child-rearing advice on others more blessed….let’s just pity her situation..and…and…ah, well… > The problem is, he LIKES saying "fuckhead" so much that he’s

Look, idiot. When you have anything relevant to say regarding the rearing of a child, please constructively contribute, rather than using the Peal’s child to satisfy your petty vendictiveness! A Concerned Parent.

Response:

>: > >:For anyone to encourage a small child (what, 18 months?) to use language >: > >:such as "xxxxhead" is just plain abusive.

[junk flushed] Mr. Keegan, it has been explained to you (by the Netcom Abuse Department, back before they kicked you off) that your habit of crossposting profanity into newsgroups where it is off-charter is something that can get you into trouble with your provider. Considering the lengths to which you have gone to many times in the past for inappropriate actions, it is only just that you get encouragement to abide by the standards you place upon others. Complaint mail regarding your activities will be sent to your postmaster by me for each and every infraction you insist on committing.  Probably by other readers of alt.parents and alt.parenting.solutions as well. I suggest you choose your newsgroups more carefully in the future. Good day. —                    The Prince of Lies "Everyone looks foolish when engaging in personal flames on serious newsgroups. "

Response:

>>:Well, if I had a kid I’d be sure an’ teach him you were a xxxxhead at >:an early age, yep. >So then you’re saying that it’s o.k. to teach kids to use profanity at >an early age?

"Pure Silk": You have been disciplined by your provider in the past for crossposting profanity into groups like misc.kids.  Your choice to do the same thing, in different newsgroups (alt.parents and alt.parenting.solutions), will be handled in exactly the same fashion. Complaint letters to your postmaster advising him or her of your activities. Good day. —                    The Prince of Lies "Everyone looks foolish when engaging in personal flames on serious newsgroups. "

Response:

: >:>I think the Peals also had that in mind, well maybe not the actual : >:>killing of Mr. Keegan, : >: : >:Sheesh, they’re kinder than I am then.  I’d tell ‘em to empty the : >:magazine first and then drag the corpse inside the house, so as to : >:keep things neat and tidy with the Federales. : Sounds like you have some clearly serious head problems Mr. Zanca.. : >:You/Keegan are a very disturbed person.  It bothers me that you are : >:not kept under heavy sedation. : It bothers me that there are people like you running loose urging : others to kill and commit suicide… And, for the record. when was the last time you threw yourself in front of Dr. Kervorkian, in any effort to stop him? Huh, stinky? — Further, you make grammar errors, show mistakes in word choice, and commit logical fallacies regularly.  I don’t.  On top of all that, you like a shithouse on fire.

Response:

—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—– ===begin 100% restore of keegan text is pretending it never happened similar to pretending a rape never happened? have you seen ms. peal even acknowledge her mistreatment and misuse of her child? if no one mentions it, will it go away? =====end restore of keegan text : Mr. Keegan, it has been explained to you (by the Netcom Abuse : Department, back before they kicked you off) that your habit of : crossposting profanity into newsgroups where it is off-charter is : something that can get you into trouble with your provider. zanca is a self-admitted liar and forger. referring to himself,

"I will fight him with forgery, I will fight him with lies and he proved that in his remark above and in his remarks below. to demonstrate his blatant dishonesty, i restored all of the text i wrote in the post to which zanca replied. : Complaint mail regarding your activities will be sent to your : postmaster by me for each and every infraction you insist on : committing.  Probably by other readers of alt.parents and : alt.parenting.solutions as well. here, zanca encourages those taken in by his lies, forgery, or both, to harass an internet service provider with the apparent hope that he can fool some readers to help him conduct his censorship activities. i suggest that any of you who are concerned about zanca’s lies, forgeries or threats of violence or harassment of isps might contact the administrator of the organization through which zanca currently posts at this address:   the following is from the alt.net (altopia corporation) online services agreement: "2.No Interference. Customer shall not restrict or inhibit any user of the System, or of another Internet or Usenet service provider or online service provider from using and enjoying the System or the Internet or Usenet. Customer shall not abuse or fraudulently use the System or the Internet or Usenet in any way." "4.No Harmful Transmissions. Customer shall not post or transmit any information or software which contains a virus,  worm, cancelbot, trojan horse or other harmful component." clearly zanca’s attempt to manipulate readers into complaining over non-existent abuse could have the effect of mailbombing an internet service provider, something clearly forbidden by the spirit of the altopia corporation online services agreement. those familiar with zanca may recall how he has used this tactic in the past. —–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—– Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM94GOg994hdoQQadAQH+agP/c7cES3pX5K7MI8+yanP+58s8GLe8eL/I V7PhIdOZiGr9KYy2A8f+l4yLjFNsfQHKF8er+c7l/H5DVrAcc5VlEpwBgtrnXC5u nJDnGU95HpeEa9nqrgvEsqPXe+SSjYFKHM45yD6iZUtvdJixTYCyDd1mJhXKQnvP jR433e6sEzQ= =5IA4 —–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

Response:

Followups reset to appropriate groups.  My apologies to the readers of alt.parenting.solutions and alt.parents for Mr. Keegan dragging his personal flamewar into your groups. : —–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—– :

: : : ===begin 100% restore of keegan text : : is pretending it never happened similar to pretending a rape never : happened? : : have you seen ms. peal even acknowledge her mistreatment and : misuse of her child? I have never mistreated or misused my child.  Your accusations are both dishonest and slanderous. : if no one mentions it, will it go away? It was never there to begin with, oh Master of Misrepresentation. : =====end restore of keegan text : : : Mr. Keegan, it has been explained to you (by the Netcom Abuse : : Department, back before they kicked you off) that your habit of : : crossposting profanity into newsgroups where it is off-charter is : : something that can get you into trouble with your provider. : : zanca is a self-admitted liar and forger. The only people supporting you in this, Pure Silk – a self-admitted liar and whore, and Jamesy Koputz whose Nick Rujak persona writes pedeophilic rape fantasies about my toddler demonstrates to what ends you will go in order to get back at me for flaming you. : : "I will fight him with forgery, I will fight him with lies and Could it be because he was giving you a taste of your own medicine? : he proved that in his remark above and in his remarks below. to : demonstrate his blatant dishonesty, i restored all of the text i : wrote in the post to which zanca replied. : : : Complaint mail regarding your activities will be sent to your : : postmaster by me for each and every infraction you insist on : : committing.  Probably by other readers of alt.parents and : : alt.parenting.solutions as well. : : here, zanca encourages those taken in by his lies, forgery, or : both, to harass an internet service provider with the apparent : hope that he can fool some readers to help him conduct his : censorship activities. There is no censorship involved in xposting profanity to groups where it is off-charter.  Your xposting profanity to misc.kids, which is exactly the same thing you have done to the parenting groups, caused you to lose your netcom account.  I see you didn’t learn anything from the experience. : i suggest that any of you who are concerned about zanca’s : lies, forgeries or threats of violence or harassment of isps : might contact the administrator of the organization through : which zanca currently posts at this address:   : I suggest that the people who want your personal vendetta off of their groups do exactly the same thing to you. : the following is from the alt.net (altopia corporation) online : services agreement: : : "2.No Interference. Customer shall not restrict or inhibit any : user of the System, or of another Internet or Usenet service : provider or online service provider from using and enjoying the : System or the Internet or Usenet. Customer shall not abuse or : fraudulently use the System or the Internet or Usenet in any way." Zanca is simply trying to clean up your act, Mr. Keegan.  Complaining about your off-charter posts is not interference.  You could stop if you really wanted to. : "4.No Harmful Transmissions. Customer shall not post or transmit : any information or software which contains a virus,  worm, : cancelbot, trojan horse or other harmful component." : : clearly zanca’s attempt to manipulate readers into complaining : over non-existent abuse could have the effect of mailbombing an : internet service provider, something clearly forbidden by the : spirit of the altopia corporation online services agreement. Stuff and nonsense.  You’re simply worried that SO many people will rightfully complain about your inappropriate posts that you will lose yet another account.  A responsible provider would recognize that. : those familiar with zanca may recall how he has used this tactic : in the past. And got you kicked off of you netcom account for it.  If you don’t want people to complain about you, stop your disruptive, off-charter, and non-constructive flames in a non-flame ng.

Response:

: : >:>>:Well, if I had a kid I’d be sure an’ teach him you were a xxxxhead at : >:>>:an early age, yep. : >:> : >:>So then you’re saying that it’s o.k. to teach kids to use profanity at : >:>an early age? : >: : >:"Pure Silk": : >: : >:You have been disciplined by your provider in the past for : >:crossposting profanity into groups like misc.kids.  Your choice to do : >:the same thing, in different newsgroups (alt.parents and : >:alt.parenting.solutions), will be handled in exactly the same fashion. : : I have *never* been disciplined by my provider for no such thing. That’s what POL just said, idiot.  Nice of you to confirm it though. : Excuse me? There is no excuse for you. : But I am posting appropriately to alt.parents, and : alt.parenting.solutions, as I am discussing the parenting techniques : concerning a young child Bull hockey.  I accidently let loose with a profanity in front of my then two-year-old who went crazy for a day using it on myself, my husband, the neighbors, the neighbor’s cats, and especially seemed to like it using keegan.  IMO, the quickest way to ensure a toddler will say something inappropriate is to punish them for it so we tried to do some damage control.   Thankfully it worked and the next day it was another word he was obsessed with.  The day after that it was another.  He loved shouting "CATfood" for about a month.  Right now he thinks "b.m." is the funniest word he’s ever heard. Bottom line is that he never used that profanity again for which I’m extremely grateful. : ..why is it my business? Because I’ve made a thorough fool of you on the flame groups and you’re trying (in your insipid ways) to get back at me. Sheesh.  Talk about childish. : Because his *mother* : decided to take it upon herself to use this child in her personal : flamewars and ‘net vendettas..She got so desperate that the only thing : she had left to use was her toddler child.This, IMO, is *bad : parenting* To proudly boast that her child possesses the ability to : use profanity towards others at such a young age indeed is *bad* : parenting. It was a funny story and entirely appropriate for a flame forum. In fact, it won me many many accolades and the "Best Narrative Flame" award for 1996. Since then (which was over a year ago) you have continually harped on that post and, with keegan, have dishonestly used it to slander me with accusations of child abuse. If I honestly thought that anybody believes a word that you, an admitted forger, say I might be upset about it.  As it stands, you’re simply spreading the fact that you’re a bitter idiot to yet more ngs, which is fine with me. : I have first amendment rights the same as you do Mr. Zanca, so if you : don’t like what I have to say, then by all means feel free to killfile : me. No one is forcing you to read my posts, nor am I forcing anyone to : read my posts. Are you saying it’s appropriate to post profanity in groups where it’s off-charter?  There’s no first amendment rights pertaining there. : The truth hurts, doesn’t it? How would *you* know? Folks, I join with Mr. Zanca in urging you to complain to Stinky’s provider for her inappropriate xposting.  She’s been disciplined in the past for doing exactly the same thing in misc.kids.  Flames should be kept in flame groups.  Period.

Response:

—–BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE—–

: > >:For anyone to encourage a small child (what, 18 months?) to use language : > >:such as "fuckhead" is just plain abusive. : > >: : > >:What kind of moron thinks it OK for kids to talk like that? : > The child actually was 28 months. But still that is an awfully young : > age to be learning the use of profanity. : > : > But unfortunately, that’s exactly what Mrs. Peal did… : : This stuff is MONTHS old….why are you dragging it back out other than : trolling???? is pretending it never happened similar to pretending a rape never happened? have you seen ms. peal even acknowledge her mistreatment and misuse of her child? if no one mentions it, will it go away? —–BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE—– Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM9v60Q994hdoQQadAQFe2wQAsOr/dePdfcBeyh/KbaCPdkC3hQ4h7xIO BczD6u+SC6WiYRtN96a1GQEy5gABPQakAkxte/lYO6yBiiuwkMGj/xW0uI7le8d1 qBTY51xVCTJ8HcjY4SGyQAvt6CXu/6xL/rz6yIKgZroSX9ktqXdVQB6msb5yxdag kdWFEvzeptg= =0cjN —–END PGP SIGNATURE—–

Response:

>:For anyone to encourage a small child (what, 18 months?) to use language >:such as "fuckhead" is just plain abusive. >: >:What kind of moron thinks it OK for kids to talk like that? >: >:Oze

The child actually was 28 months. But still that is an awfully young age to be learning the use of profanity. But unfortunately, that’s exactly what Mrs. Peal did…

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >: >: >: >:> >:> >For anyone to encourage a small child (what, 18 months?) to use language >:> >such as "fuckhead" is just plain abusive. >:> > >:> >What kind of moron thinks it OK for kids to talk like that? >:> >:> Well, I’m not sure what the best way to bring kids up is, really, but >:> teaching them to hate Keegan is a good start… >:> >:   Indeed. And then when they’re old enough to handle the recoil of a >: .38, teach them to kill Keegan… >: >:

I think the Peals also had that in mind, well maybe not the actual killing of Mr. Keegan, but certainly Nora clearly shows intentions of teaching her child violence when she made *this* remark… You are, of course, assuming that his teacher survived the Show And Tell day Logan brought his machete AND

Response:

>: >:>For anyone to encourage a small child (what, 18 months?) to use language >:>such as "fuckhead" is just plain abusive. >:> >:>What kind of moron thinks it OK for kids to talk like that? >: >:Well, I’m not sure what the best way to bring kids up is, really, but >:teaching them to hate Keegan is a good start… >: >:Peter

So you *condone* teaching kids to *hate*? IMO, there already is too much hatred in the world, certainly people have the right to dislike someone, but there certainly is no reason to *hate* and condone teachings of hate.

Response:

>: >:>when you question the expression of opinion in a talk >:>newsgroup, it almost seems like you’re defending >:>something. were you defending nora’s parenting habit >:>of teaching her child to hate and to use obscenities >:>to revile her net enemies? >: >:Well, if I had a kid I’d be sure an’ teach him you were a fuckhead at >:an early age, yep.

So then you’re saying that it’s o.k. to teach kids to use profanity at an early age? >: >:>probably not. perhaps you were just trying to flame one >:>of your net enemies and lacked the creativity to do so >:>without making such a fool of yourself. >: >:Keegan’s talking about a ‘lack of creativity’.

If anyone has lack of creativity, it certainly is Nora Peal, she lacks all intellect and creativity when it comes to parenting techniques.. [...] <sigh…> no wonder the world is in such a sad state of affairs these days..

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->:For anyone to encourage a small child (what, 18 months?) to use language >:such as "fuckhead" is just plain abusive. >: >:What kind of moron thinks it OK for kids to talk like that? >: >:Oze > The child actually was 28 months. But still that is an awfully young > age to be learning the use of profanity. > But unfortunately, that’s exactly what Mrs. Peal did…

This stuff is MONTHS old….why are you dragging it back out other than trolling???? —   oOOO() The Phillips Three   |  (   Almost Heaven West Virginia   __)                                                 ()OOOo          (_             )  |  jgs      (__/

Response:

Question:

I would suggest that you purchase or borrow from the library a book called Holding Time by Martha Welsh,  MD.,  Dr. Welsh describes a method for reestablishing the bond between child and caregiver.  It is an excellent method, simple, non technical, and it really works.  We used this method of basically just holding one’s child very closely, and allowing one’s child to vent it’s feelings in a safe, harmless, and acceptable manner. It made an enormous difference to our children, and to us, and our enjoyment of them.  If you have any problem getting the book, I can describe this method in detail or put you in touch with Dr Welch. Rayner > I’m disappointed — I too am in the same boat with a 4 and a half year old > who can be very difficult and an 8 and a half year old who is very easy > going.  I read this group in hopes of learning ways to deal with not only > them, but also our overall family life.  I’m surprised that someone’s > response in a parenting solutions newsgroup would be we can’t help you, > seek professional help.

Snip>>>

Response:

I’m disappointed — I too am in the same boat with a 4 and a half year old who can be very difficult and an 8 and a half year old who is very easy going.  I read this group in hopes of learning ways to deal with not only them, but also our overall family life.  I’m surprised that someone’s response in a parenting solutions newsgroup would be we can’t help you, seek professional help. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> A friend has two sons, a placid agreeable 5 year old and an 8 year old who > causes havoc anywhere and everywhere. > He is extremely compulsive, and hits out viscously at any perceived slight. ETC>>>snipped….. > ==== > Please don’t try and sort out a matter like this on the internet. This > sort of case needs professional input and on a family and face-face > level. This child needs help, and discussing his case here is not the > best way of providing it. > — > AlanC+

Response:

> A friend has two sons, a placid agreeable 5 year old and an 8 year old who > causes havoc anywhere and everywhere. > He is extremely compulsive, and hits out viscously at any perceived slight. ETC>>>snipped…..

==== Please don’t try and sort out a matter like this on the internet. This sort of case needs professional input and on a family and face-face level. This child needs help, and discussing his case here is not the best way of providing it. — AlanC+

Response:

Question:

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Lori: When I started this group a few years ago, I chose not to make it moderated and it was intended to be the place you thought is would be:  a caring and sharing newsgroup (is there really such a thing?) where I would post articles about different situations and questions that come up in parenting especially about control issues, discipline, etc. It seems to me and several others that other people don’t seem to share that desire.  There is a lot of cross posting from the Spanking group and a few others.  I’m sorry now that I didn’t make it a moderated group and don’t have the time to moderate it properly. If there are any volunteers who want to help moderate with me, I will be happy to check to see if it’s possible to switch it from unmoderated to moderated.  But I need to know that the volunteers are serious and will be willing to help long term.  I’m frequently out of the country so I couldn’t manage it alone. I also think that with the fighting and arguing and judgemental thinking by some people I’ve seen join this group or who have crossposted to it, it’s no wonder they’re having problems with their kids. KIDS MODEL WHAT THEY SEE! Lois – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> When I first started reading this group, I though it would be very helpful > because of the title "Parenting Solution".  Being a mother of an only > child, I have many concerns and problems that I need advice on.  I have > found it is very helpful to be able to discuss my concerns with other > parents who have gone through the same situation. > Recently, however, I am beginning to think that the title should be change > to "Parents Who Want to Argue About Who Is Right".  We are all adults here > and we all should realize that no everyone else in the world thinks the > way we do.  That does not mean they are wrong, they just simply have > different ideas about the way things should be handled. > Now when I read the posts, approximately 75% or more of them are different > parents bashing each other back and forth for weeks over the same subject. >  It is never about solutions, it is about trying to prove who is right and > who is wrong.  Come on people, what kind of parents are we if we teach our > children that anyone who thinks differently from them is wrong and is > therefore lesser of a person?  Is this the image we want to project? > I do realize that is is very tempting to lash out at someone who posts a > message that you are totally opposed to but keep in mind, they are people > too and they are entitled to their own beliefs.  I choose to ignore the > rash statements made by some, such as "beat his behind" or "you are not a > good parent because you work".  While I do not agree with some posts, I am > adult enough to realize that many people are going to have different views > than myself and that, no matter how many times we post back and forth, it > is very unlikely that person is going to change their views. > Can we please try to concentrate on why this group is here and what we all > want to achieve?  Let’s not set a bad example for our children, okay? > Lori

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="Htcsig" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Htcsig" Lois E Paul, Executive Director         Voice       (209) 478-5585 Help The Children                               FAX         (209) 478-5586 1350 W Robinhood Dr Ste2            TDD/TTY     (209) 478-5685                                              HTTP://www.adopting.org/htc.html                       – All Children Are Gifted….                      They Just Open Their Presents At Different Times –

Response:

When I first started reading this group, I though it would be very helpful because of the title "Parenting Solution".  Being a mother of an only child, I have many concerns and problems that I need advice on.  I have found it is very helpful to be able to discuss my concerns with other parents who have gone through the same situation. Recently, however, I am beginning to think that the title should be change to "Parents Who Want to Argue About Who Is Right".  We are all adults here and we all should realize that no everyone else in the world thinks the way we do.  That does not mean they are wrong, they just simply have different ideas about the way things should be handled. Now when I read the posts, approximately 75% or more of them are different parents bashing each other back and forth for weeks over the same subject.  It is never about solutions, it is about trying to prove who is right and who is wrong.  Come on people, what kind of parents are we if we teach our children that anyone who thinks differently from them is wrong and is therefore lesser of a person?  Is this the image we want to project? I do realize that is is very tempting to lash out at someone who posts a message that you are totally opposed to but keep in mind, they are people too and they are entitled to their own beliefs.  I choose to ignore the rash statements made by some, such as "beat his behind" or "you are not a good parent because you work".  While I do not agree with some posts, I am adult enough to realize that many people are going to have different views than myself and that, no matter how many times we post back and forth, it is very unlikely that person is going to change their views. Can we please try to concentrate on why this group is here and what we all want to achieve?  Let’s not set a bad example for our children, okay? Lori

Response:

Question:

The point isn’t who is to blame or who is right and who is wrong. In regard to this topic and the way we *adults* have handled it When the stuff starts flying it lands on everyone!  I think that is a point and lesson we all have learned…  like SnL wrote….What is alt.parenting.solutions?

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I agree.  It’s time top lay this one to rest!  Allie obviously has > opinions of her own (of which I might add she is entitled to).  However > turning a topic into a battleground in a place that was designed to  offer >  support, advice, and  outlets for PARENTS reaching out for solutions from > others that have been there. > it is unfortuante that the CHAT rooms have been turned into > dating rooms.  That would be a better forum for allie to vent her pet > peeve among other childless single people  who would be her Ali there. > This group is not heraldo rivera, jenny jones… > this has been a haven for many, a hug when you really need it and full of > loving caring parents. > Let’s redisn the thread to What is alt.parenting solutions to you > and let it be.

PLEASE!  I agree 100% Janice

Response:

>I agree.  It’s time top lay this one to rest!  Allie obviously has >opinions of her own (of which I might add she is entitled to).  

this is directed at me…so I will respond. I answered Mary’s posting and I think it will give you an idea of why I think that this topic was relevant to this group.  I did NOTstart the battle ground singling anyone out and calling them insulting names etc.  I responded in kind only after I was personally attacked. If you all think that tantrums are low on the list of priorities, if you all think that not being concerned about manners and proper behavior is NOT an important subject, then you’re very welcomed to your little clique.  You may try to silence me, but believe me there’s alot just like me who’ll be more than happy to come back here and be equally as vocal.  People are sick of badly parented children. What really amuses me most is that if you and yours don’t have the type of kids I’m supposedly describing, what’s your beef? In the mean time, Read the thread in chronlogical order.  I did not sling mud *first* here.  You’ll also be surprised to know that not everyone happens to disagree with my point of view. Allie

Response:

Thanks for putting it all back in perspective, sorry I was a contributor to this madness, wish I never even read past the first post.  You are right, let’s move on. Karyn – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> okay okay….so i think we have pretty much covered the topic… > nails are starting to come out and all of us are beginning to > appear as one of those children in the store.

Response:

>just like the tantrums of our children…we have the ability to prove once >and for all that our decisions to ignore the children through their >youthful ignorance and realize that they outgrow tantrums and the >behaviors….or person….goes away!

How very clever.  "or person"…Next time you have a flame,  perhaps you should have the guts to post under your normal aol.account name and point a finger at the person directly.  Coward. .

Response:

I agree.  It’s time top lay this one to rest!  Allie obviously has opinions of her own (of which I might add she is entitled to).  However turning a topic into a battleground in a place that was designed to  offer  support, advice, and  outlets for PARENTS reaching out for solutions from others that have been there. it is unfortuante that the CHAT rooms have been turned into dating rooms.  That would be a better forum for allie to vent her pet peeve among other childless single people  who would be her Ali there. This group is not heraldo rivera, jenny jones… this has been a haven for many, a hug when you really need it and full of loving caring parents. Let’s redisn the thread to What is alt.parenting solutions to you and let it be.

Response:

okay okay….so i think we have pretty much covered the topic… nails are starting to come out and all of us are beginning to appear as one of those children in the store. A child wants his way or his opinion agreed with and his need immediately met and of course….HE IS RIGHT! The parent through  the experience of trial and error –  trys their very best to alter and hopefully bring an end to those "screaming tantrums". Sometimes the negoitiating, pleading, removing them from the store, unavailble childcare, and every self help book available (most of which say to do this very thing) does not change or prevent the tantrums from happening —-The solution is IGNORE the CHILD and demonstrate that we all must go about the business of living despite obstacles that come in our way. A very valuable lesson! The numerous posts to this topic have left many of us bouncing back and forth in our own tantrum (me included).  I would suggest that instead of letting certain individuals rule the topic of what this newsgroup is really about and refocus our efforts towards the task at hand…being supportive of one another. just like the tantrums of our children…we have the ability to prove once and for all that our decisions to ignore the children through their youthful ignorance and realize that they outgrow tantrums and the behaviors….or person….goes away!

Response:

Question:

>to: bttrflyw       I have the same problem…..who do we complain to?

This is a bit "off topic" from parenting solutions, but to stem the tide of off-topic posts here, I’ll answer:  Write a letter of complaint to webmaster.  FYI, questions about AOL newsgroup problems are better posted in one of AOL’s own newsgroups. Gloria

Response:

 Test once again…..           Nick K. "Stupidity has a certain charm…….ignorance does not" – Frank Zappa

Response:

Test….sorry….

Response:

When i go to read my newsgroups on AOL it says there are 11 new posts.  When I click on read, the page only lists 2 or three. Other times I see posts marked RE:  Blah blah.  I have never seen the original post. just curious

Response:

When I read the newsgroups through AOL the same thing happens a lot of times.  Occassionally, I will get the original message a couple of weeks after reading the replys to it!   Janice

Response:

to: bttrflyw       I have the same problem…..who do we complain to?  

Response:

not really sure who complaints go to with this concern.  good to know its not my computer screwing it up!

Response:

>When i go to read my newsgroups on AOL it says there are 11 >new posts.  When I click on read, the page only lists 2 or three. >Other times I see posts marked RE:  Blah blah.  I have never seen the >original post. >just curious

        I have the part about,  missing the original post, happen too. I posed this question within my local ISP and found out that it could be many things. Your server just might not be getting it all ( mine is going to look into it) or it takes longer in travel and might not get to you as fast as you can see it in DejaNews, but eventually you might get it, late. I don’t know if it would do any good, but I would let AOL know about this. If they don’t know it’s happening then they can’t fix it. Although I’m sure it must be happening to others too and hopfully they have reported it. Lisa Jones

Response:

Question:

The uneducated parents are effecting their childrens health by the treatments on their property.  Do you understand when people use lawn care chemicals that have the abilty to harm children and allow their children on the lawns,  that problems begin.  Why, lack of eductaion. Could you give me five major diffrences between a root and a stem.  A 6th grade student in my area can tell you. Parents worry more about computers and cars than mother nature.  This is wrong. Parents need to be kept informed.  I will continue to do so. LOVE ya all.  Hi Wendy — John A. Keslick Jr.              There is no scientific data to show Professional Modern Arborist     that TRUNK WRAPS prevent heat or & Tree Biologist                 cold injuries.  Nor is there any Phone: 610-696-5353              data to show that WOUND DRESSINGS organic tree treatment web site: stop rot.  There is data to show that http://www.ccil.org/~treeman/    that both can cause decline of – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

writes: >How is this related to parenting solutions?????

Wendy,    It’s not.  But to Treeman, everything must in some way connect to tree-care or lawn chemicals.  Thanks for mentioning it.  I was wondering the same thing, but didn’t want to say anything.                 Phan

Response:

How is this related to parenting solutions?????

Response:

EVIDENCE OF TAX MONEY WASTED Thirteen years and thousands of dollars ( federal tax money) were spent studying the effects of WOUND DRESSINGS.  Wound dressings are any substance applied to tree wounds to stop rot and stop invasions by pest, e.g., pruner sealer, wound dressing and paints.  The studies were by Alex L. Shigo and Walter C. Shortle at the North Eastern Experimental Forestry  Station in Durham,  New Hampshire USA.  I personally have had the pleasure of speaking with  both men.  Any tax money spent on research either of these two men has been involved with  has proven to have been 100 fold in return.  The results, of the THIRTEEN YEAR studies,  were that wound dressings and treatments applied to the face of wounds on trees, never increased the trees’ ability to close efficiently or deter pests.  More so, commonly the increase of decay took place when they applied wound dressings.  Further, the renown DR. ALEX L. SHIGO and his associates rewrote the book on pruning and wounds.  This was a time when they did not waste our TAX MONEY.   REFERENCE: WOUND DRESSINGS: RESULTS OF STUDIES OVER 13 YEARS. by Alex L. Shigo and Walter C. Shortle in the Journal of Arboriculture 9(12): December 1983. Now,  MONEY IS WASTED when the EPA does not respect the results of the research we paid to  have done.  I.e., when they issue a PESTICIDE REGISTRATION NUMBER to many companies to place products like wound dressing and pruner sealer on the shelves of our stores.  No scientific evidence has ever been properly presented to show that any of these products (dressings and sealers) do what they say they do on the label!    However, evidence does show the ability to cause the increase of rot and yes, they are carcinogenic.  So people who are uneducated in the anatomy of trees are misled daily at our expense!  Something to think about.   The problem with wound dressings is that we have been lead to believe that we can do whatever we want to that tree.  Then just like a band aid we can use wound dressings and paints and it is a forgiveness of sin.   THIS HAS YET TO BE SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN UNDER PROPER RESEARCH. I really question if this is just an example of how the EPA forgets other research done at our expense and then registers other pesticides, i.e., which have the ability to hurt pregnant women, children, pets, wild life, water, and the list goes on. — John A. Keslick Jr.              There is no scientific data to show Professional Modern Arborist     that TRUNK WRAPS prevent heat or & Tree Biologist                 cold injuries.  Nor is there any Phone: 610-696-5353              data to show that WOUND DRESSINGS organic tree treatment web site: stop rot.  There is data to show that http://www.ccil.org/~treeman/    that both can cause decline of – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

Question:

I try to buy organic too, but it’s not available close to home. If I can’t buy organic, I always peel the apples.  I know it loses some nutrients that way, but I just hate the thought of eating (or my kids eating) that wax! Marti > >>Is there anything I should know about the wax they put on apples and other

..> I have researched this too, and the wax itself is harmless, but Lisa is – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> correct.  There are pesticide residues on all food that is not labeled > "organic" … > There is enough uncertainty that for my family, it is worth paying the > extra price for organic food.  Especially for my kids. > Annie Hamilton

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>Is there anything I should know about the wax they put on apples and other >>fruit.  I fanatasize that it helps the fruit skin retain pestacides or >>something, so I scrape as much off as I reasonably can before I give it to >>my kids.  I look for unwaxed fruit but I’ve noticed the stuff on dsicount >>is a gamble.   >. >The wax is used only for improving the looks of the fruit.  But it is >completely harmless.  If you remove that wax, you would be hard >pressed to tell it apart from the so called discount fruit. >    I remember seeing a show on this, and I’m pretty sure that the > pesticide is still on the apples when they are waxed.  So that wax is > actually sealing it in and not allowing one to wash away the > pesticide. > Lisa Jones

I have researched this too, and the wax itself is harmless, but Lisa is correct.  There are pesticide residues on all food that is not labeled "organic"  People argue alot about the effects of these pesticide residues and you hear anything from no effect to sure cancer.  The problem is that there have not been enough tests done on the effects for anyone to say really what the effects are, so anyone who says they know this or that is probably just an extremist.   But that is not to say that the lack of information means you are safe. Govt regs on this subject are laughable.  For instance they say, you should only ingest so much of this or that pesticide residue – then they go on to say what the average consumption of certain foods is, and calculate that if you eat the average amount you will be safe.  But the average amounts are laughable – like one cantaloupe per year, or two pounds of broccoli per year (we eat a pound a week).  I was told that these standards were set up in the 50s when fruit and vegetable consumption was much lower than today.  But the really  frightening thing is that these standards are for an average size adult.  So if you are a slight woman like me, or even worse, a child and eat more than two pounds of broccoli a year, who knows what the effects are. The wax on apples does indeed keep you from being able to wash pesticide residues off the apples. There is enough uncertainty that for my family, it is worth paying the extra price for organic food.  Especially for my kids. Annie Hamilton

Response:

Is there anything I should know about the wax they put on apples and other fruit.  I fanatasize that it helps the fruit skin retain pestacides or something, so I scrape as much off as I reasonably can before I give it to my kids.  I look for unwaxed fruit but I’ve noticed the stuff on dsicount is a gamble.   Thanks. – Ron Low Levity is the dearth of gravity.  Brevity is the height of clarity.  

Response:

>Is there anything I should know about the wax they put on apples and other >fruit.  I fanatasize that it helps the fruit skin retain pestacides or >something, so I scrape as much off as I reasonably can before I give it to >my kids.  I look for unwaxed fruit but I’ve noticed the stuff on dsicount >is a gamble.   .

The wax is used only for improving the looks of the fruit.  But it is completely harmless.  If you remove that wax, you would be hard pressed to tell it apart from the so called discount fruit.

Response:

>>Is there anything I should know about the wax they put on apples and other >fruit.  I fanatasize that it helps the fruit skin retain pestacides or >something, so I scrape as much off as I reasonably can before I give it to >my kids.  I look for unwaxed fruit but I’ve noticed the stuff on dsicount >is a gamble.   >. >The wax is used only for improving the looks of the fruit.  But it is >completely harmless.  If you remove that wax, you would be hard >pressed to tell it apart from the so called discount fruit.

        I remember seeing a show on this, and I’m pretty sure that the pesticide is still on the apples when they are waxed.  So that wax is actually sealing it in and not allowing one to wash away the pesticide. Lisa Jones

Response:

HELP THE CHILDREN PRESENTS: PARENTING SOLUTIONS Special Thoughts on Raising Kids Lois Paul, Executive Director                          LYING Lying in childhood is a phase.  However, if the phase is handled incorrectly by adults, the phase could develop into a life stance. Many parents unconsciously make lying an issue by asking, "Is that the truth?" when there is really no solid reason to doubt the child.  Sometimes when a child is dejected or down, parents may say, understandably, "What’s wrong?"  The child will say, not wanting to talk, "Oh, nothing." At this point it is not wise for the parent to say, "Is that the truth?" or, "Don’t you fib to me," but to say instead, "Well, if you want to talk, I’m here." The most common mistake parents make is to try and force their child to tell the truth when the parents already know the truth.  This almost always ends in a control battle that neither parent nor child feels good about.  Often the child continues to lie, getting deeper and deeper into negative feelings with the parent. Here’s how this parent avoids a control battle centered around stolen cookies by assuming the child knows the parent knows the truth of the situation: Parent:  "Robert, come here.  What did I tell you about           these cookies?" Robert:  "Not to eat them, but I didn’t." Parent:  "What did I tell you?" Robert:  "Not to eat them." Parent:  "Thank you!  What did I say I was saving them           for?" Robert:  "Paul’s party." Parent:  "Right.  This hacks me off. You hit your room           right now and think things over." Robert:  "But. . ." Parent:  "Where do you need to go to think things over?" Robert:  "My room." Parent:  "Thank you!" If parents know the truth, and try to get their child to admit it, it is a hidden way of saying, "I know you are going to continue to lie to me." When a child las lied, restitution needs to be made.  The consequence is handled coolly and as non-emotionally as possible so that when our children do tell the truth about a difficult issue, we can say, "Wow, I bet that was hard to say!  Thanks for the truth!" The emotion we have as parents is best reserved for when the child says or does something right. Children can be "convicted" and consequenced on strong circumstantial evidence.  Parents who find a candy wrapper in a child’s room and allow the child to protest that no candy has been eaten are almost asking for the child to lie.  A wise parent says, "I always take empty candy wrappers as evidence a person has eaten one.  I think you need to give the whole thing some thought.  If you still need to think about it over dinner time, no big deal." Lastly, it is better to tell a child, "I don’t believe you," than to say. "You’re lying."  It is easy for a child to argue he is telling the truth, but he can’t argue with the fact that you don’t believe him! THERE ARE FIVE BASIC RULES FOR HANDLING LYING BY CHILDREN: 1.  Don’t try to force your child to tell the truth when you already know it!  Generally speaking, trying to force the child – ever – to tell the truth is a control battle the adult will lose. 2.  Give your child more positive emotion for being honest than negative emotion for lying. 3.  Consequence lying without anger. 4.  Children may be consequenced for circumstantial evidence. 5.  It is better to tell children we don’t believe them than tell them they are lying.

[ HTCSIG < 1K ]

Lois E Paul, Executive Director         Voice       (209) 478-5585 Help The Children                       FAX         (209) 478-5586 1350 W Robinhood Dr Ste2        TDD/TTY     (209) 478-5685                                   HTTP://www.adopting.org/htc.html                       – All Children Are Gifted….                      They Just Open Their Presents At Different Times –

Response:

>Lying is sometimes a defense mechanism…

I also heard of another reason lying crops up in adolescents.  They just want a little privacy, so when mom asks "what did you do last night?" they cook up a little story.  It may not be any more innocent, – or saucy, or less interesting – than what actually happened, but it shields them from fully revealing themselves.   – Ron Low Levity is the dearth of gravity.  Brevity is the height of clarity.  

Response:

>Say, "I know that you took >the money, and I’d like to work on a plan for how it can be returned."

I’m sorry, I’ve read *so* many of these now I’ve got to say something. Do you people actually *say* this stuff? I know I’d get some really strange looks and not just from the kids. IM(H)O this is a good example of why we now have to have discussions on why kids are out of control. It’s TOO SOFT. However, something that works for me, 95% of the time (no lie) is this scenario Teacher: Did you do this? (whatever it might be) Pupil: No. Teacher: Are you lying to me? (Those exact words – no ambiguity, firm but pleasant) Pupil: Yes. (Like I said, in 95% of cases) Situation diffused, honesty prevails and further confrontation avoided. Bonus is property returned, vandalism repaired etc etc. It works, as I say, for me. Maybe I’m just lucky. JMC

Response:

From the book Positive Discipline A-Z a Teachers Guide by Dr. Jane Nelsen. http://www.empoweringpeople.com Lying Discussion Students who lie or resort to fabrication are neither defective nor immoral. Lying is sometimes a defense mechanism for people who fear that the truth will be ridiculed or dismissed or will reflect badly on them. Why would anyone tell the truth if the result will be punishment or disapproval?      Teachers need to discover the reasons students lie before they can help them give up their need to lie. Whenever possible, look behind the falsehood or fabrication to see its intent. Teachers can learn a lot about students by letting them talk instead of correcting them or ignoring them.      Children between the ages of four and five typically lie or fabricate stories because the difference between real and unreal is hazy to them. Older children may lie to prevent parents or teachers from worrying about what their kids or students are doing or to avoid hurting the adults’ feelings. Students who deceive may feel trapped or afraid of punishment. They may fear rejection or feel threatened. They may truly believe that lying will make a situation easier for everyone. They may be trying to make themselves look better in other people’s eyes because they don’t believe they’re good enough as they are. They may want to impress or upset others. They may be trying to tell you something important, but they lack the words or skills to do it any other way. Suggestions 1. Be aware of asking setup questions that may invite lying. Focus on solutions to the problem rather than blame. If you’re certain that a student has stolen money from a class kitty, don’t ask, "Did you take the money?" Say, "I know that you took the money, and I’d like to work on a plan for how it can be returned." 2. If your instinct tells you that a student is lying, you might say, "That doesn’t sound like the truth to me. Most of us find it hard to tell the truth when we’re feeling trapped or scared. Let’s both think about how we can focus on solutions and then talk about this during lunch or after school. Which would work best for you?" 3. Address the student’s feelings instead of his words: "As you’re telling me this, you sound nervous. Let’s talk about that." 4. Rather than saying, "That’s not true," try saying, "Tell me more about that." 5. With a young student, play "Let’s Pretend," and embellish the child’s story with improbable details. Laugh together, and then discuss the difference between pretend and real. Ask whether the details you supplied were imaginary or real. Help the child develop his ability to distinguish the two. 6. If you think students are playing games with you, let them know that it’s okay to tell stories and you like hearing them. Share with them that it’s respectful for people to let their listener know when they’re telling tall tales. Planning Ahead to Prevent Future Problems 1. Create an atmosphere that assures students they won’t be punished or receive disapproval for making mistakes. Let them know that they will have opportunities to learn from mistakes and to find solutions to problems with the help of the whole class, the teacher, or a small group of students. 2. Teach about mistakes at a class meeting. Help your students see mistakes as opportunities to learn, so they won’t believe that they are bad for making mistakes or that mistakes should be covered up. 3. Allow time for fabricated stories. This can be done through journal writing, telling stories while the group sits in a circle, or sharing one-on-one during a break. 4. An insecure student may lie to enhance her image. This student has found that she can win attention and recognition by embroidering on her experiences or fabricating tales. Help this student find other ways to earn recognition or attention. 5. Help the student who deceives to see how his fabrications impact others. He is hoping that this behavior will attract people to him and may not realize that it’s actually pushing them away. 6. Share the story of a time when you told a lie and it caused you trouble. Students often feel freer to admit their mistakes if they know you have also made some. You may even have a true story of a time when it was difficult for you to tell the truth about something you’d done, but you decided that it was more important to experience the consequences and keep your self-respect than to protect yourself. Be sure that this is an honest sharing instead of a lecture. 7. All the ways in which you show your students that you care about them will help to reduce the incidence of lying. Knowing that your teacher sees you as a likable person enhances feelings of belonging and importance.[NL ends] Inspirational Stories David and Mr. Ventana Mr. Ventana saw David break a beaker in the chemistry laboratory. This student had lied to Mr. Ventana in the past. David had an ability to use his words in a disarming way to get himself out of uncomfortable or threatening situations.      Instead of asking David whether he broke the beaker, which would almost certainly lead to a lengthy story, Mr. Ventana walked up to him and said, "David, I noticed that you broke the beaker. We all have accidents, but it will need to be replaced. How can I assist in making that happen?" By stating what he saw and focusing on finding a solution rather than placing blame, Mr. Ventana helped David to accept responsibility for his action. http://www.empoweringpeople.com

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I won’t be revisiting this list so I would appreciate it if I wasn’t > discussed in future. I realize this is a tall order, but it’s rather > humiliating. I initially asked for private responses. > Please accept my extreme gratitute to those of you who ‘defended’ me and > those of you who sent questions and advice to me privately. But I don’t > have a thick enough skin to participate in what happened here. > I don’t need to be told that having a child with someone you’re not > married to is a terrible thing to do to a child. I am harder on myself > than anyone could ever be. I have given over everything to parenting, and > gone way out of my way to foster the relationship with my sons father, > I make sure they are told about and invited to any Dr. appt,  conferences, > all games, performances, parties. I offer up extra time also. >  To hear my son being called ‘lonely fatherless child’ has broken > me. I have sacrificed my entire life and feelings and needs and done my > very best – and yet I asked for help on how I could do more. I blame > myself, I thought I’d made that clear. I am devasted daily, by what I’ve > done, bringing him to a family so split. Hearing more about how horrible I > am, I don’t need. > Again, thanks for the support you’ve given. Thanks for the advice you did > give privately. I will read it another time, just not right now. > How about going back to what you were discussing before I ever appeared on > the list. Thanks.

I don’t blame you one bit.  I’m pretty disgusted with this group to. Reading some responses to your letter was the last straw and I’m not returning either.  Good luck with raising your child…you sound like a good mom. Karen Mommy to Brandon 4 1/2, Dylan 3, and Caden 1.

Response:

: This is the nastiest thing I have ever seen—ranks right up there with : the White race purity postings….. ???  Are we talking about the same message?  Jana should have been very pleased to get the message I sent her. I told her that her son is in fact a completely normal little boy. He’s NOT a compulsive liar.  Also, that no parent is required to totally give up their social life as a "sacrifice" to their child. She can now build a social life separate from her child. This should be the best news that she has received in years. — Elaine Gallegos

Response:

Interchange: Santa Clara Interagency Network for Infant/Toddler Intervention organizes a Family Fair with resources for young children with special needs: Saturday 11 october, 1997 from 10 am till 2 pm in Guadalupe park in San Jose, California (next to the children’s discovery museum (free parking at the adobe rldg) What can you expect: Information for parents and caregivers Community resources Activities and fun for the children Entertainment This events is sponsored by: Early Start Programs & Interchange. Parents and professionals working together to provide coordinated services for families with young children with special needs. If you have questions you can contact 408-559-1400.

Response:

Now if you had been that nice to begin with, we would not be having this conversation….. Kathleen – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >: This is the nastiest thing I have ever seen—ranks right up there with >: the White race purity postings….. >???  Are we talking about the same message?  Jana should have been very >pleased to get the message I sent her. I told her that her son is in fact >a completely normal little boy. He’s NOT a compulsive liar. > Also, that no parent is required to totally give up their social life as >a "sacrifice" to their child. She can now build a social life separate >from her child. This should be the best news that she has received in >years.

Response:

>  Gee, if you’re not going to be reading this, I guess I can just go ahead > and tell you the truth without fear of sending you into another tizzy. >  You act as if you really want to hear the truth from people, but in the > infamous words of Jack Nicholson, "YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH". >  The main truth is that you seem to expect the world to dance to your > beck and call. >  Your delicate sensibilities don’t seem to preclude repeatedly accusing > your tiny son of lying. >  Evidently, you do. So what were you thinking when you got pregnant with > him?

<<many rude and cruel thoughtless comments snipped>> Again, Elaine, you appear heartless and petty minded.  Not every lives in your perfect world and you have no right to judge her life or anyone elses.  I really don’t believe you and your life are as perfect as you seem to want us to think.  Actually, I think I pity your child more than Jana’s.

Response:

This is the nastiest thing I have ever seen—ranks right up there with the White race purity postings….. Elaine–this ng is called alt. parenting. SOLUTIONS for a reason–it is NOT called alt.parenting. let’s just knock people down for the hell of it.  People come here and ask for help for many different problems they may be having.   Your brand of "help" is destructive and certainly NOT what is needed.  What good does it do to be told that you shouldn’t have had kids??  They already have kids, and kids come with a "no refunds, no return" policy.  So the thing to do now is to get help if you are stuck on a particular issue, especially some advice from other parents who may have successfully dealt with your issue.  THAT is the purpose of this newsgroup. Recriminations and piling on the guilt does nothing to help solve the problem.  If you are here just to spew venom, well its an unmoderated ng, so I suppose we are stuck with you, but I wish you would consider the ramifications of what you post here.  Okay–you made Jana feel really bad about even having a child and being a single parent, but in what way does that help the child??  What would you suggest that would actually HELP the child now??  Or are you too busy beating people up to have time for some really constructive suggestions? Kathleen New Jersey

Response:

Oh just ignore her. She’s doing the same thing in misc.kids On Usenet arguing just fuels the fire; the only way to deal with inflammatory people is to IGNORE them until they get bored and go away. — If this looks funny I’m                 typing with the baby on my lap!

Response:

elaine, you should be ashamed of yourself.  i can not believe that you could be so hurtful to the woman!  she came to this group asking for advice, and all you can do is abuse her. >  Gee, if you’re not going to be reading this, I guess I can just go ahead > and tell you the truth without fear of sending you into another tizzy.

yeah….much nicer to slag someone when you know they are not going to know about it!   >  The main truth is that you seem to expect the world to dance to your > beck and call.

excuse me??? i thought this newsgroup was to ask other parents for advice and maybe get some….how on earth can that be interpreted as wanting the world to dance to your beck and call???  i think you have serious problems >  Your delicate sensibilities don’t seem to preclude repeatedly accusing > your tiny son of lying.

oh please….we all know that children lie…..it is something they are faced with every day.  i’d hardly say your statement is very fair. the whole point of the original posting was for HELP to overcome this lying! >  Evidently, you do. So what were you thinking when you got pregnant with > him? What were you thinking when you decided to raise him yourself without > a full time father?

who died and elected YOU god elaine.  it is a fact that in this world there are single parent families.  Yes, i am one myself.  I elected to raise my daughter alone.  I have not excluded her father from her life completely, i’d never be so heartless.  However i felt it healthier for me and my child to live apart from my husband.  at least my daughter now has a chance to know what it is like to live in a loving environment, not one full of abuse and hatred.   > Who asked you to do that? Where did you get the idea that your child would > be better off if you had no personal life? Are you using the boy to hide > from life?

ask most single parents who care for their children.  yes, you usually give up a personal life for that.  i certainly dont begrudge my daughter and constantly remind her what i am giving up for her sake.  i hardly feel it is even an issue.  it was my choice…i would rather spend what little time i have with my daughter with her, not out socialising while she spends even more time with strangers/babysitters.  you have no right elaine, to accuse Jana of this. >  How do you think the little boy feels? Your child has a life and feelings > of his own. How do you think it feels to have no real daddy? If you had > one, picture your life only being able to see him on visiting days. If >you didn’t have a daddy, shame on you for laying this pain on another >little child.

how do you know that the child feels like he’s missing out??  it sounded to me that he had a very good relationship with his father still.  i have seen more healthier and nicer behaved children from single parents who love their children than from so called proper families with a mother and a father still living together, and that family thinking they are doing the right thing by staying together just because thats what people think is right.  i suppose you are one of those morons that thought murphy brown should have been banned for promoting single mothers! >  Any "sacrificing" you did, you did for YOU. Your child doesn’t want you to "sacrifice". What a cruel burden to lay on a child.

CRAP!!!!!  every parent…single or married knows that having a child will mean sacrifices of some kind.  do you burden your children with the sacrifices YOU made????  so why lay guilt on other people i think you do not deserve to be a parent elaine, you have too much of your own growing up to do.  I feel very sorry for your children…..they need love and caring and understanding, and i doubt you can supply them with that unconditionally….you can’t even support a fellow mother who needs help! there are a lot of words i would like to call you elaine, caring mother not being one of them <vent over> Becky

Response:

> In the original post (I wish I had kept it) the mom indicated that the father is involved in the childs life…and many other family members are as well, so th > Stef

Stef…put returns in your posts please. — "DIDN’T I TEACH YOU TO LOVE ALL THINGS GREAT AND SMURF??" – papa smurf   oOOO() The Phillips Three   |  (   Almost Heaven West Virginia   __)                                                 ()OOOo          (_             )  |  jgs      (__/

Response:

I agree with you.  Either Elaine didn’t fully express what she meant or it was a terribly unfair comment.  I reread the original post and I didn’t see Jana say that her son says "nobody loves me".  Also I have an 8 yr old step daughter and when she was 5-6 she often said things were going on that I would find out to be untrue.  I would ask her what she would have for breakfast at her mommy’s and she would reply "nothing, my mommy doesn’t feed me breakfast", which I knew to be untrue.  For whatever her reason she wanted my husband and I to feel that she was horribly neglected and starved at her moms house.  She is now 8 and no longer does that sort of thing because she can communicate so much clearer and fully understand the importance of being truthful.  It took a couple of years of growing up on her part, but that stage is gone.  To the original poster – we did take my sdaughter to a child psychologist for a variety of reasons and that dr. used "art or drawing" therapy because of her age and it worked great – it was very helpful to get her to communicate her feelings.  Good luck and pls ignore posters that are nasty in reply.  There are a lot of caring and concerned parents just like you who post to this ng and who really want to help and support each other. — – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I think this is a horribly unfair and unreasonable resoponse to a > legitimate request for help.  Although I have no insite into the lying > problem, I howp that Jana will not believe everyone in the group is so > arrogantly judgemental as  Elaine. >  What did you do with your marriage? You separated from the child’s father > with a little boy to raise? You appear to have little understanding of > children or men. I think that it would be extraordinarily difficult to > tell you the truth or to be honest with you. Your problems are greater > than your son’s problems. > : I haven’t read this group so I don’t know what it covers, but I am seeking > : suggestions. > : I have a 6 yr old boy who is really good, always has been. Never given me > : any grief except for this issue. He fibs alot. I think it’s alot and I > : think of it as lying.

Response:

: I won’t be revisiting this list so I would appreciate it if I wasn’t : discussed in future. I realize this is a tall order, but it’s rather : humiliating. I initially asked for private responses.  Gee, if you’re not going to be reading this, I guess I can just go ahead and tell you the truth without fear of sending you into another tizzy.  You act as if you really want to hear the truth from people, but in the infamous words of Jack Nicholson, "YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH".  The main truth is that you seem to expect the world to dance to your beck and call. : Please accept my extreme gratitute to those of you who ‘defended’ me and : those of you who sent questions and advice to me privately. But I don’t : have a thick enough skin to participate in what happened here.  Your delicate sensibilities don’t seem to preclude repeatedly accusing your tiny son of lying. : I don’t need to be told that having a child with someone you’re not : married to is a terrible thing to do to a child.  Evidently, you do. So what were you thinking when you got pregnant with him? What were you thinking when you decided to raise him yourself without a full time father? : I am harder on myself : than anyone could ever be.  You are. Or at least you go throught the motions to make people think that you are. Did you expect to get points for self flaggilation? : I have given over everything to parenting, and : gone way out of my way to foster the relationship with my sons father, : I make sure they are told about and invited to any Dr. appt,  conferences, : all games, performances, parties. I offer up extra time also.  Did you think you’d get extra points for giving up your personal life? Who asked you to do that? Where did you get the idea that your child would be better off if you had no personal life? Are you using the boy to hide from life? :  To hear my son being called ‘lonely fatherless child’ has broken : me.  How do you think the little boy feels? Your child has a life and feelings of his own. How do you think it feels to have no real daddy? If you had one, picture your life only being able to see him on visiting days. If you didn’t have a daddy, shame on you for laying this pain on another little child. > I have sacrificed my entire life and feelings and needs

 Any "sacrificing" you did, you did for YOU. Your child doesn’t want you to "sacrifice". What a cruel burden to lay on a child. — Elaine Gallegos

Response:

In the original post (I wish I had kept it) the mom indicated that the father is involved in the childs life…and many other family members are as well, so therefore he is not a lonely little boy…many children learn young how to manipulate (and I dont mean manipulate in a derogatory term), and saying *you don’t love me* is one of those manipulations. Lying, fibbing, whatever you want to call it is also a manipulation. We *all* manipulate in some form or another to get by in life.  (For instance, Elaine’s know it all attitude is a manipulation for attention). This childs manipulation is also probably for attention, but only a qualified psychologist can say for sure.  The worst problem his mother has, is having to deal with people like Elaine. Stef – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >: I think this is a horribly unfair and unreasonable resoponse to a >: legitimate request for help.  Although I have no insite into the lying >: problem, I howp that Jana will not believe everyone in the group is so >: arrogantly judgemental as  Elaine. > It’s not the child. It’s the parents. You have no insight into the >child’s >problem because he sounds like a perfectly normal, healthy 6 year old boy. >You seem to feel obligated to support the adults. Has it occured to you >that it’s not the child who is really in trouble here? > The child goes, "nobody loves me". The mom interprets this as a "lie". >How can it be a "lie" that the child feels unloved? He feels as he feels. >Mom is just hung up on this idea of "lying" and seems to show little >sympathy for a lonely, fatherless little boy…who happens to be her own >son. > Remember the old joke, "doctor, you must help my wife…she thinks she’s >a chicken"….. >– >Elaine Gallegos

Response:

What on earth gives you the right to condem a woman for being separated??  It sounds like her son has a serious problem with telling lies, and it would be unfair to blame Jana for separating from the father.  You have no idea why they separated, who’s to blame (if anyone) or anything.  I think your reply was selfish and totally uncalled for. She was asking for help, not criticism.  I certainly did not get the impression that it would be hard to be honest with her just from her post.  It sound like it is YOU that has the problem. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >  What did you do with your marriage? You separated from the child’s father > with a little boy to raise? You appear to have little understanding of > children or men. I think that it would be extraordinarily difficult to > tell you the truth or to be honest with you. Your problems are greater > than your son’s problems.

Response:

Excuse me, but what do you know of the situation that gives you the authority to answer in this manner? Nothing in this womans post gives any indication of her understanding of little boys or men….WHat do you know of her problems to say they are greater than her sons? Her son obviously has a problem….and I certainly dont have the answer, but I wouldnt tell her she has worse problems, I know nothing of her life and neither do you!!! SJC – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What did you do with your marriage? You separated from the child’s father >with a little boy to raise? You appear to have little understanding of >children or men. I think that it would be extraordinarily difficult to >tell you the truth or to be honest with you. Your problems are greater >than your son’s problems. >: I haven’t read this group so I don’t know what it covers, but I am seeking >: suggestions. >: I have a 6 yr old boy who is really good, always has been. Never given me >: any grief except for this issue. He fibs alot. I think it’s alot and I >: think of it as lying. (my mother gets after me for using that word) >: Anyway, he doesn’t seem to think anything of it – he tells his daddy I >: never let him watch tv, he tells me his daddy hides in his room watching >: bastketball all the time on visit days. He says so and so teacher said he >: could bring —- to school. None of the kids like him, nobody ever plays >: with him, he didn’t mess up the couch-he hasn’t even sat on it yet(there’s >: nobody else there)yet he sticks to his story, to the point of tears. >: These may seem petty, but there is a pattern and it scares me. He lies to >: get something he wants which can get the grownups in his life mad at each >: other. But the ones that scare me are the lies so I don’t get mad. What if >: he put one of my pills in his mouth, what if he makes up a story about >: being harrassed or about his father or I hurting him. >: It’s a pattern and its frequent. It’s been going on for years and we have >: done all kinds of things to try to change it. I feel like I can’t believe >: him when something might really be happening at school or whatever and >: that’s very hard. What if someone really was dangerous? Will I realize >: it’s not just another lie? >: I work the barest minimum so he isn’t in daycare after school, I don’t >: watch any TV of my own or do anything to distract from him when we’re >: home. I don’t have any dates or social life, he’s never been left with a >: babysitter at night (cuz I’m not with him in the day so I have no biz >: going away at night too) and his father, stepmo and little halfbro love >: him to pcs. He has grammas and all manner of other loving others – so it’s >: not that old lack of attention they ofter attribute lying behaviour to. >: Have any of you experienced this in the extreme? Can you help us? >: (private re: please, can’t read the boards – company computer acct) >: Thanks. >– >Elaine Gallegos

Response:

I think this is a horribly unfair and unreasonable resoponse to a legitimate request for help.  Although I have no insite into the lying problem, I howp that Jana will not believe everyone in the group is so arrogantly judgemental as  Elaine. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >  What did you do with your marriage? You separated from the child’s father > with a little boy to raise? You appear to have little understanding of > children or men. I think that it would be extraordinarily difficult to > tell you the truth or to be honest with you. Your problems are greater > than your son’s problems. > : I haven’t read this group so I don’t know what it covers, but I am seeking > : suggestions. > : I have a 6 yr old boy who is really good, always has been. Never given me > : any grief except for this issue. He fibs alot. I think it’s alot and I > : think of it as lying.

Response:

: I think this is a horribly unfair and unreasonable resoponse to a : legitimate request for help.  Although I have no insite into the lying : problem, I howp that Jana will not believe everyone in the group is so : arrogantly judgemental as  Elaine.  It’s not the child. It’s the parents. You have no insight into the child’s problem because he sounds like a perfectly normal, healthy 6 year old boy. You seem to feel obligated to support the adults. Has it occured to you that it’s not the child who is really in trouble here?  The child goes, "nobody loves me". The mom interprets this as a "lie". How can it be a "lie" that the child feels unloved? He feels as he feels. Mom is just hung up on this idea of "lying" and seems to show little sympathy for a lonely, fatherless little boy…who happens to be her own son.  Remember the old joke, "doctor, you must help my wife…she thinks she’s a chicken"….. — Elaine Gallegos

Response:

I haven’t read this group so I don’t know what it covers, but I am seeking suggestions. I have a 6 yr old boy who is really good, always has been. Never given me any grief except for this issue. He fibs alot. I think it’s alot and I think of it as lying. (my mother gets after me for using that word) Anyway, he doesn’t seem to think anything of it – he tells his daddy I never let him watch tv, he tells me his daddy hides in his room watching bastketball all the time on visit days. He says so and so teacher said he could bring —- to school. None of the kids like him, nobody ever plays with him, he didn’t mess up the couch-he hasn’t even sat on it yet(there’s nobody else there)yet he sticks to his story, to the point of tears. These may seem petty, but there is a pattern and it scares me. He lies to get something he wants which can get the grownups in his life mad at each other. But the ones that scare me are the lies so I don’t get mad. What if he put one of my pills in his mouth, what if he makes up a story about being harrassed or about his father or I hurting him. It’s a pattern and its frequent. It’s been going on for years and we have done all kinds of things to try to change it. I feel like I can’t believe him when something might really be happening at school or whatever and that’s very hard. What if someone really was dangerous? Will I realize it’s not just another lie? I work the barest minimum so he isn’t in daycare after school, I don’t watch any TV of my own or do anything to distract from him when we’re home. I don’t have any dates or social life, he’s never been left with a babysitter at night (cuz I’m not with him in the day so I have no biz going away at night too) and his father, stepmo and little halfbro love him to pcs. He has grammas and all manner of other loving others – so it’s not that old lack of attention they ofter attribute lying behaviour to. Have any of you experienced this in the extreme? Can you help us? (private re: please, can’t read the boards – company computer acct) Thanks.

Response:

>3.  Consequence lying without anger.

By using "consequence" as a verb, you presumably mean "punish"? So why not call a spade a spade? Taking Children Seriously (paper) journal To subscribe to the Taking Children Seriously list (non-coercive parenting "subscribe TCS [your email address]"

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > :P arent:  "Robert, come here.  What did I tell you about > these cookies?" > :Robert:  "Not to eat them, but I didn’t." :P arent:  "What did I tell > you?" :Robert:  "Not to eat them."  :Parent:  "Thank you!  What did I > say I was saving them > for?" > :Robert:  "Paul’s party." :P arent:  "Right.  This hacks me off. You hit > your room > right now and think things over." > :Robert:  "But. . ." :P arent:  "Where do you need to go to think things > over?" :Robert:  "My room." :P arent:  "Thank you!" > Sorry, Lois. I disagree again. > I say, the parent should have put the cookies where the  child couldn’t > get them if the parent did not want the child to have them.

Sorry, Yoipu, I agree again with Lois, this isn’t about cookies, but about discipline. Fine if you’ve remembered perfectly to put the thing that child shouldn’t have away, but we aint all perfect, and so sometimes the child WILL take or get hold of something we don’t want them to have, for whatever good reason we may have. > I also think it’s wrong to coerce my version of reality on someone, > regardless of their age. I think it’s healthier to  state what I > believe, and explain that I’m acting on my belief, rather than coercing > them to accept my version of reality.

I too believe in reasoning and explaining to a child, and did so with my present 28 and 26 year olds to wonderful affect–they feel they had an excellent upbringing, very fair, etc. However, there are those (rare) moments when the parent has to or decides to say NO, or DO THIS, and there’s no time for explanations, or one has already been given but is being questioned, etc etc. THEN, further explanation or "my belief" …. statements to the child just get received as a message that we parent’s aren’t all that convinced of our ground, and if they keep saying "Why?" or whineing or whatever, then they’ll win out by persisting over us. We need to give a clear, crisp firm but also soft and gentle NO, one that can’t be mistaken, one that is con- gruent with our best assertiveness, our body language. And sending the child to a spot in view "to think about it" till she/he is willing to comply (if there’s time) is an ideal alternative to the spanking and the abuse that you so rightly oppose. Have I convinced YOU, Yoipu? Larry — lArry                         M I T ‘63                                   |A  N                                                                        |N  K            SHERWOOD, NOTTINGHAM,          ENGLAND                      |K

Response:

:P arent:  "Robert, come here.  What did I tell you about :          these cookies?" :Robert:  "Not to eat them, but I didn’t." :P arent:  "What did I tell you?" :Robert:  "Not to eat them." :P arent:  "Thank you!  What did I say I was saving them :          for?" :Robert:  "Paul’s party." :P arent:  "Right.  This hacks me off. You hit your room :          right now and think things over." :Robert:  "But. . ." :P arent:  "Where do you need to go to think things over?" :Robert:  "My room." :P arent:  "Thank you!" Sorry, Lois. I disagree again. I say, the parent should have put the cookies where the child couldn’t get them if the parent did not want the child to have them. I also think it’s wrong to coerce my version of reality on someone, regardless of their age. I think it’s healthier to state what I believe, and explain that I’m acting on my belief, rather than coercing them to accept my version of reality.

Response:

HELP THE CHILDREN PRESENTS: PARENTING SOLUTIONS Special Thoughts on Raising Kids Lois Paul, Executive Director                          LYING Lying in childhood is a phase.  However, if the phase is handled incorrectly by adults, the phase could develop into a life stance. Many parents unconsciously make lying an issue by asking, "Is that the truth?" when there is really no solid reason to doubt the child.  Sometimes when a child is dejected or down, parents may say, understandably, "What’s wrong?"  The child will say, not wanting to talk, "Oh, nothing." At this point it is not wise for the parent to say, "Is that the truth?" or, "Don’t you fib to me," but to say instead, "Well, if you want to talk, I’m here." The most common mistake parents make is to try and force their child to tell the truth when the parents already know the truth.  This almost always ends in a control battle that neither parent nor child feels good about.  Often the child continues to lie, getting deeper and deeper into negative feelings with the parent. Here’s how this parent avoids a control battle centered around stolen cookies by assuming the child knows the parent knows the truth of the situation: Parent:  "Robert, come here.  What did I tell you about           these cookies?" Robert:  "Not to eat them, but I didn’t." Parent:  "What did I tell you?" Robert:  "Not to eat them." Parent:  "Thank you!  What did I say I was saving them           for?" Robert:  "Paul’s party." Parent:  "Right.  This hacks me off. You hit your room           right now and think things over." Robert:  "But. . ." Parent:  "Where do you need to go to think things over?" Robert:  "My room." Parent:  "Thank you!" If parents know the truth, and try to get their child to admit it, it is a hidden way of saying, "I know you are going to continue to lie to me." When a child las lied, restitution needs to be made.  The consequence is handled coolly and as non-emotionally as possible so that when our children do tell the truth about a difficult issue, we can say, "Wow, I bet that was hard to say!  Thanks for the truth!" The emotion we have as parents is best reserved for when the child says or does something right. Children can be "convicted" and consequenced on strong circumstantial evidence.  Parents who find a candy wrapper in a child’s room and allow the child to protest that no candy has been eaten are almost asking for the child to lie.  A wise parent says, "I always take empty candy wrappers as evidence a person has eaten one.  I think you need to give the whole thing some thought.  If you still need to think about it over dinner time, no big deal." Lastly, it is better to tell a child, "I don’t believe you," than to say. "You’re lying."  It is easy for a child to argue he is telling the truth, but he can’t argue with the fact that you don’t believe him! THERE ARE FIVE BASIC RULES FOR HANDLING LYING BY CHILDREN: 1.  Don’t try to force your child to tell the truth when you already know it!  Generally speaking, trying to force the child – ever – to tell the truth is a control battle the adult will lose. 2.  Give your child more positive emotion for being honest than negative emotion for lying. 3.  Consequence lying without anger. 4.  Children may be consequenced for circumstantial evidence. 5.  It is better to tell children we don’t believe them than tell them they are lying.

[ MOMSIG < 1K ]

Lois E Paul, Executive Director         Voice       (209) 478-5585 Help The Children                       FAX         (209) 478-5586 41 West Yokuts Avenue, Suite 107        TDD/TTY     (209) 478-5685                                   HTTP://www.adopting.org/htc.html Mother to Helene (27), Erica (26), Thiago (16), Andy (10) and grandmother to Joshua (5), Jessica (5), and ? (due in Dec 96)                                - All Children Are Gifted….                They Just Open Their Presents At Different Times-

Response:

Question:

:When children are teased about being different, parents may :handle it in two ways. First, some parents protect their :child and talk to the children doing the teasing.  This may :be helpful in the long run, but it may covertly say to the :child being teased, "You can’t handle the situation and you :need some help." I seldom disagree with what you post, Lois. This is one of those times. When a child has come to the parent for help, the child has already acknowledged that the problem is beyond it’s capability. I say, in such cases where a child wants help, give it to them. Teaching them how to solve the problem themselves is fine if it’s within their capability. Sometimes, though, things are just beyond the child, and need parental intervention. With name calling, I would try helping the child resolve it himself/herself. If the child were afraid, though, I would intervene, and call parents and authorities. If needed, I would ask the police to approach the children and talk to them. Sometimes, just having the police talk to them is enough to solve the problem.

Response:

I completely agree with this poster. When my daughter was 9 years old she was having a problem with a family of children that used the same bus stop. She wasn’t just hurt, she was AFRAID of these kids. I went round to the parents house, who lived close by, and attempted to talk to the parents. I went away from that house AFRAID OF THE PARENTS! I eventually called the police because these kids were threatening outright violence against my daughter.The owners of the apartment complex I lived in served the parents with a restraining order to keep their kids off the complex property and I ended up spending the rest of the school year driving my daughter back and forth to school. You gotta do what you gotta do. We ended up moving to a different school district. Donna > With name calling, I would try helping the child resolve it > himself/herself. If the child were afraid, though, I would intervene, > and call parents and authorities. If needed, I would ask the > police to approach the children and talk to them. Sometimes, > just having the police talk to them is enough to solve the > problem.

– "It has become appallingly clear that our technology  has surpassed our humanity"  Albert Einstein

Response:

HELP THE CHILDREN PRESENTS: PARENTING SOLUTIONS Special thoughts on Raising Kids Lois Paul, Executive Director           "THEY’RE CALLING ME NAMES." Parents are understandably concerned when their children are called names or teased for being different.  Oftentimes parents wonder, "Why does this happen?  Why are children so mean to each other?" Children call each other names, not to necessarily make others feel bad, but to make themselves feel good.  As nationally known educational consultant, Jim Fay, explains, "Children who are hurting inside want to make others hurt on the outside so that they can feel better about them- selves."           Two Ways of Dealing with Name-Calling When children are teased about being different, parents may handle it in two ways. First, some parents protect their child and talk to the children doing the teasing.  This may be helpful in the long run, but it may covertly say to the child being teased, "You can’t handle the situation and you need some help." It’s often better to strengthen the child rather than try to lighten the load.  Listening with empathy, as you child explains the situation, is a good way to start.  Then teach the child "I messages" or ways to express how he/she feels rather than telling what the other person needs to do.  A conversation with your child might go something like this: Parent:  What would happen if you told these children who          pick on you to "Cut it out!"  Are they going to          like you or get mad at you?   Child:   Get mad at me. PaRENT:  Right.  The trick is to tell them how you feel          inside, not to tell them what’s wrong with them.          You might say, "That makes me feel pretty bad."          Does that say there is something wrong with them          or just tell them how you feel? Child:   How I feel. Parent:  Right.  That’s called an "I" message/  You know,          how "I" feel. Child:   OK. Parent:  There’s also a "You" message.  And "You" messages          make people feel madder.  If I say to you,  "Hey,          I don"t like what you’re doing," is that a "You"          message or an "I" message? Child:   "You" message. Parent:  Right.  Tell them how you feel inside.  Be nice            about it.  But tell them exactly how you feel.          So you are going to send what kind of messages? Child:   "I" messages. Parent:  And you’re not going to send . .? Child:   "You" messages. Nothing we say to your children can take away the hurt of their being teased.  However, we can help them cope with and handle the hurt appropriately.  We let them know that there will be many other hurts in their lives and we are certain that they will be able to cope with those too.           WHEN YOUR CHILDREN ARE BEING PICKED ON:           1. LISTEN WITH EMPATHY.           2. TEACH THE USE OF "I" MESSAGES.

[ MOMSIG < 1K ]

Lois E Paul, Executive Director         Voice       (209) 478-5585 Help The Children                       FAX         (209) 478-5586 41 West Yokuts Avenue, Suite 107        TDD/TTY     (209) 478-5685                                   HTTP://www.adopting.org/htc.html Mother to Helene (27), Erica (26), Thiago (16), Andy (10) and grandmother to Joshua (5), Jessica (5), and ? (due in Dec 96)                                - All Children Are Gifted….                They Just Open Their Presents At Different Times-

Response: